§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. RUTTERSCHMIDT

Appellant, Olga Rutterschmidt, Petition for Review

68 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,411 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"

  2. United States v. Olano

    507 U.S. 725 (1993)   Cited 11,251 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain error review requires a reviewing court to refrain from correcting an error unless it is plain and affects "substantial rights," such that the error "seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings"

  3. Davis v. Washington

    547 U.S. 813 (2006)   Cited 4,803 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements made "in the course of police interrogation" are testimonial when made under "circumstances objectively indicat[ing] ... that the primary purpose of the interrogation [was] to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution"

  4. Melendez–Diaz v. Massachusetts

    557 U.S. 305 (2009)   Cited 3,550 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a certification that material seized by the police included cocaine was testimonial

  5. Neder v. United States

    527 U.S. 1 (1999)   Cited 4,946 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure to submit an uncontested element of an offense to a jury may be harmless

  6. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 23,474 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

  7. Delaware v. Van Arsdall

    475 U.S. 673 (1986)   Cited 7,279 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on defendant's ability to crossexamine witness in violation of Sixth Amendment was non-structural error

  8. Gerstein v. Pugh

    420 U.S. 103 (1975)   Cited 4,604 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to any extended restraint on liberty following an arrest

  9. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin

    500 U.S. 44 (1991)   Cited 1,753 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that detentions of more than 48 hours without a judicial determination of probable cause are presumptively unconstitutional

  10. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 755 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "statute should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous"

  11. Section 3501 - Admissibility of confessions

    18 U.S.C. § 3501   Cited 990 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding of voluntariness is possible if admission made within six hours of arrest or detention; thereafter court must find reasonable ground for delay in arraigning defendant

  12. Rule 8.200 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae

    Cal. R. 8.200   Cited 713 times

    (a)Parties' briefs (1) Each appellant must serve and file an appellant's opening brief. (2) Each respondent must serve and file a respondent's brief. (3) Each appellant may serve and file a reply brief. (4) No other brief may be filed except with the permission of the presiding justice, unless it qualifies under (b) or (c)(7). (5) Instead of filing a brief, or as part of its brief, a party may join in or adopt by reference all or part of a brief in the same or a related appeal. (Subd (a) amended