25 Cited authorities

Bordenkircher v. Hayes
434 U.S. 357 (1978) Cited 2,899 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that plea bargaining does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
People v. Superior Court (Romero)
13 Cal.4th 497 (Cal. 1996) Cited 6,213 times
Holding that the sentencing court has the power under the Three Strikes Law to dismiss one or more prior “strikes” in the interest of justice
People v. Viray
134 Cal.App.4th 1186 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 288 times
Holding that failure of counsel to contest an order for attorney fees did not forfeit an objection on appeal
Dix v. Superior Court
53 Cal.3d 442 (Cal. 1991) Cited 441 times
Construing § 1170, subd. (d)
People v. Williams
21 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 1999) Cited 212 times
Holding that "[i]f the [appellate] court cannot determine from the available record whether the action is barred, it should . . . remand for a hearing"
People v. Eubanks
14 Cal.4th 580 (Cal. 1996) Cited 176 times
Holding that the appearance of impropriety alone is not an independent ground for prosecutorial disqualification and an actual conflict must be so grave as to make fair treatment unlikely in order to disqualify the district attorney's office
People v. Peevy
17 Cal.4th 1184 (Cal. 1998) Cited 134 times 1 Legal Analyses
Rejecting defendant's attempts in the appellate court to present evidence of widespread police misconduct
United States v. Cowan
524 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1975) Cited 186 times
Finding an abuse of discretion where the trial court refused to dismiss the entire Texas indictment as to one of the two defendants in lieu of the Washington, D.C. indictment, which was contemplated by the parties' plea agreement
People v. Tenorio
3 Cal.3d 89 (Cal. 1970) Cited 192 times
In People v. Tenorio (1970) 3 Cal.3d 89, 91-95 [89 Cal.Rptr. 249, 473 P.2d 993] (Tenorio), we held that a statute requiring a trial court to secure a prosecutor's consent to dismiss an allegation of a prior conviction violates the state Constitution's separation of powers clause by improperly invading the constitutional province of the judiciary.
People v. Sesslin
68 Cal.2d 418 (Cal. 1968) Cited 131 times
In People v. Sesslin (1968) 68 Cal.2d 418, the defendant was convicted of forgery based on handwriting exemplars obtained after he had been arrested illegally.
Rule 48 - Number of Jurors; Verdict; Polling
Fed. R. Civ. P. 48 Cited 252 times 2 Legal Analyses
Providing that "the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

STEEN v. APPELLATE DIVISION

25 Cited authorities

Holding that plea bargaining does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination

Holding that the sentencing court has the power under the Three Strikes Law to dismiss one or more prior “strikes” in the interest of justice

Holding that failure of counsel to contest an order for attorney fees did not forfeit an objection on appeal

Construing § 1170, subd. (d)

Holding that "[i]f the [appellate] court cannot determine from the available record whether the action is barred, it should . . . remand for a hearing"

Holding that the appearance of impropriety alone is not an independent ground for prosecutorial disqualification and an actual conflict must be so grave as to make fair treatment unlikely in order to disqualify the district attorney's office

Rejecting defendant's attempts in the appellate court to present evidence of widespread police misconduct

Finding an abuse of discretion where the trial court refused to dismiss the entire Texas indictment as to one of the two defendants in lieu of the Washington, D.C. indictment, which was contemplated by the parties' plea agreement

In People v. Sesslin (1968) 68 Cal.2d 418, the defendant was convicted of forgery based on handwriting exemplars obtained after he had been arrested illegally.

Providing that "the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"