48 Cited authorities

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

    20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 2,420 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,654 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  3. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,203 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  4. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

    19 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 640 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”
  5. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.

    23 Cal.4th 429 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing and remanding for reconsideration because the court was not "prepared to say that class treatment necessarily is proper," and "upon a fresh look [the trial court] may discern valid reasons for denying" the certification motion
  6. Rakestraw v. California Physicians' Service

    81 Cal.App.4th 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 476 times
    Requiring party to "clearly and specifically set forth the ‘applicable substantive law’ and the legal basis for amendment, i.e., the elements of the cause of action and authority for it," and all specific factual allegations for the claim
  7. Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans of California

    21 Cal.4th 1066 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 245 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim for public injunctive relief under California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) is not arbitrable, although damages claims under the CLRA are arbitrable
  8. Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.

    91 Cal.App.4th 224 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 225 times
    Finding that application of California law to a class settlement was appropriate when "substantial numbers of class members are located in California"
  9. Vasquez v. Superior Court

    4 Cal.3d 800 (Cal. 1971)   Cited 459 times
    Holding that reliance could be inferred on a classwide basis where all plaintiffs were induced by specific, uniform misrepresentations to purchase freezers and frozen food
  10. Schnall v. Hertz Corp.

    78 Cal.App.4th 1144 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 176 times
    Finding that disclaimers do not give notice to the reasonable consumer when they are incomprehensible and needlessly complex
  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,827 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  12. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,671 times   67 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  13. Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203   Cited 984 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct
  14. Section 1780 - Action by consumer; remedies; senior citizens or disabled persons; costs and attorney's fees

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1780   Cited 648 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing to consumers who have suffered damage "as a result of" a violation
  15. Section 1781 - Class action

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1781   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Invalidating class-action waivers for claims brought under that statute
  16. Section 32

    Cal. Const. art. XIII § 32   Cited 159 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No legal or equitable process shall issue in any proceeding in any court against this State or any officer thereof to prevent or enjoin the collection of any tax. After payment of a tax claimed to be illegal, an action may be maintained to recover the tax paid, with interest, in such manner as may be provided by the Legislature. Cal. Const. art. XIII § 32

  17. Section 1760 - Liberal construction and application

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1760   Cited 151 times
    Stating the purpose of the CLRA is "to protect consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices"
  18. Section 1751 - Waiver of provisions

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1751   Cited 91 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Any waiver by a consumer of the provisions of this title is contrary to public policy and shall be unenforceable and void. Ca. Civ. Code § 1751 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  19. Section 1752 - Remedies in addition to other remedies or procedures

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1752   Cited 50 times

    The provisions of this title are not exclusive. The remedies provided herein for violation of any section of this title or for conduct proscribed by any section of this title shall be in addition to any other procedures or remedies for any violation or conduct provided for in any other law. Nothing in this title shall limit any other statutory or any common law rights of the Attorney General or any other person to bring class actions. Class actions by consumers brought under the specific provisions

  20. Section 1656.1 - Addition of sales tax reimbursement to sales price

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1656.1   Cited 28 times
    Establishing a presumption that a customer agrees to "reimburse" the retailer for the sales tax if, among other possibilities, the amount of the tax is shown on the customer's receipt
  21. Section 1700 - Reimbursement for Sales Tax

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 1700   Cited 4 times
    Containing identical language