§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. CORREA

Respondent’s Answer Brief on the Merits

25 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Harrison

    48 Cal.3d 321 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 1,344 times
    Upholding separate punishments for three acts of sexual penetration over the course of less than 10 minutes where "each of defendant's 'repenetrations' was clearly volitional, criminal and occasioned by a separate act of force."

  2. Bell v. United States

    349 U.S. 81 (1955)   Cited 1,022 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding only one Mann Act charge could result from the single transport of two women

  3. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing Com

    43 Cal.3d 1379 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 888 times
    Holding that the statute did not extend to cover remedies that were “different in kind from the enumerated remedies,” because “ more reasonable reading of the phrase ‘including, but not limited to,’ ... permitting only additional corrective remedies comports with the statutory construction doctrines of ejusdem generis, expressio unius est exclusio alterius and noscitur a sociis.”

  4. People v. Gonzalez

    43 Cal.4th 1118 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 425 times
    Holding that after a trial court imposes and executes a firearm enhancement with the longest term under section 12022.53, the remaining section 12022.53 firearm enhancements and any section 12022.5 firearm enhancements "that were found true for the same crime" must be imposed and then stayed rather than stricken

  5. People v. Mendoza

    23 Cal.4th 896 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 455 times
    In People v. Mendoza (2000) 23 Cal.4th 896, 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 431, 4 P.3d 265 (Mendoza), a jury convicted the defendants of murder without specifying the degree but also found true the special circumstance that it was committed during a robbery.

  6. People v. Britt

    32 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 393 times
    In Britt, supra, 32 Cal.4th 944, 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 87 P.3d 812, this court did not rely upon or cite the Neal footnote.

  7. Neal v. State of California

    55 Cal.2d 11 (Cal. 1960)   Cited 1,594 times
    Holding that defendant who threw gasoline into a bedroom and ignited it could not be punished for both attempted murder and arson because the arson was the means used to commit the crime of attempted murder

  8. People v. Beamon

    8 Cal.3d 625 (Cal. 1973)   Cited 972 times
    Holding under section 654 that " ‘execution of sentence for Count 1 [must] be stayed pending the finality of this judgment and service of sentence as to Count 2, such stay is to become permanent when service of sentence as to Count 2 is completed’ "

  9. People v. Bell

    49 Cal.3d 502 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 525 times
    Finding it was “far from clear” that a 5 percent absolute disparity was sufficient

  10. Green v. State

    42 Cal.4th 254 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 292 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FEHA protects only employees with a disability who can perform the essential duties of the job with reasonable accommodation