8 Cited authorities

People v. Scott
61 Cal.4th 363 (Cal. 2015) Cited 709 times
Holding forfeited defendant's claim that the trial court erred by failing to state its reasons for imposing full consecutive terms under section 667.6(c)
People v. Sánchez
63 Cal.4th 411 (Cal. 2016) Cited 390 times
Holding that a defendant forfeited a similar challenge to an analogous CALJIC instruction regarding certainty
People v. Capistrano
59 Cal.4th 830 (Cal. 2014) Cited 361 times
Holding any error in allowing a testifying analyst to describe results obtained by a nontestifying analyst was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in part because the testifying analyst "personally" performed the STR test implicating the defendant
People v. Leon
61 Cal.4th 569 (Cal. 2015) Cited 344 times
Holding trial court did not err in allowing evidence relating to dismissed charges to be admitted to show evidence of motive and intent
People v. Thompson
1 Cal.5th 1043 (Cal. 2016) Cited 255 times
Recognizing that ex parte hearing "may be necessary to protect a defendant's rights"
People v. O'Malley
62 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2016) Cited 231 times
Deferring to court's credibility determinations
People v. Salazar
63 Cal.4th 214 (Cal. 2016) Cited 198 times
Concluding state law standard of error applies to alleged failure to give cautionary instruction
People v. Parker
2 Cal.5th 1184 (Cal. 2017) Cited 95 times
Concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant voluntarily waived his Miranda rights where he "actively participate[d] in the conversation with the detectives—answering questions, asking for clarification, and generally contributing to a discussion he knew was being tape-recorded"

PEOPLE v. HARDY

8 Cited authorities

Holding forfeited defendant's claim that the trial court erred by failing to state its reasons for imposing full consecutive terms under section 667.6(c)

Holding that a defendant forfeited a similar challenge to an analogous CALJIC instruction regarding certainty

Holding any error in allowing a testifying analyst to describe results obtained by a nontestifying analyst was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in part because the testifying analyst "personally" performed the STR test implicating the defendant

Holding trial court did not err in allowing evidence relating to dismissed charges to be admitted to show evidence of motive and intent

Recognizing that ex parte hearing "may be necessary to protect a defendant's rights"

Deferring to court's credibility determinations

Concluding state law standard of error applies to alleged failure to give cautionary instruction

Concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant voluntarily waived his Miranda rights where he "actively participate[d] in the conversation with the detectives—answering questions, asking for clarification, and generally contributing to a discussion he knew was being tape-recorded"