162 Cited authorities

  1. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 26,650 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
  2. Blakely v. Washington

    542 U.S. 296 (2004)   Cited 16,617 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
  3. Ring v. Arizona

    536 U.S. 584 (2002)   Cited 4,999 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[i]f a State makes an increase in a defendant's authorized punishment contingent on the finding of a fact, that fact—no matter how the State labels it—must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”
  4. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

    473 U.S. 432 (1985)   Cited 9,707 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class
  5. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 23,494 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
  6. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 12,560 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's right to self-representation was denied when he made his requests "weeks before trial" without any indication that the defendant was required to reassert his request during the trial
  7. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

    412 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 11,972 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
  8. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 13,233 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here
  9. Edwards v. Arizona

    451 U.S. 477 (1981)   Cited 6,430 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that continued questioning violates Fifth Amendment if suspect clearly asserts right to counsel
  10. Sullivan v. Louisiana

    508 U.S. 275 (1993)   Cited 3,283 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a constitutionally deficient reasonable doubt instruction constitutes structural error as the deprivation of the right to trial by jury has "necessarily unquantifiable and indeterminate" consequences and "unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error’ "
  11. Section 187 - Murder

    Cal. Pen. Code § 187   Cited 19,847 times
    Defining murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being . . . with malice aforethought."
  12. Section 211 - Robbery

    Cal. Pen. Code § 211   Cited 14,304 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Requiring taking of personal property of another
  13. Section 664 - Punishment for attempt to commit crime

    Cal. Pen. Code § 664   Cited 12,481 times
    Requiring intent to kill for attempted murder
  14. Section 12022.53 - Personal use of firearm during commission of specified felonies

    Cal. Pen. Code § 12022.53   Cited 12,203 times
    Providing for an enhancement to any person who, in the commission of attempted murder, "personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, . . . , or death, to any person other than an accomplice."
  15. Section 459 - Burglary

    Cal. Pen. Code § 459   Cited 11,898 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a "person who enters" certain locations "with intent to commit grand or petit larceny or any felony is guilty of burglary"
  16. Section 12022.7 - Persona infliction of great bodily injury on person other than accomplice in commission of felony or attempted felony

    Cal. Pen. Code § 12022.7   Cited 8,401 times
    Adopting section 13700's definition of domestic violence
  17. Section 190.2 - Penalty for defendant found guilty of first-degree murder with special circumstance

    Cal. Pen. Code § 190.2   Cited 5,951 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing penalty of death or LWOP for special circumstance murder
  18. Section 1368 - Doubt about mental competence of defendant during pendency of action

    Cal. Pen. Code § 1368   Cited 1,900 times
    Requiring a court to appoint an attorney for a defendant in a criminal case if a doubt arises in the mind of the judge as to the defendant's mental competence
  19. Section 215 - Carjacking

    Cal. Pen. Code § 215   Cited 1,885 times
    Requiring as an element of carjacking an "intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the person in possession of the motor vehicle of his or her possession [of the vehicle]"
  20. Section 16

    Cal. Const. art. I § 16   Cited 1,777 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the right to a "trial by jury is an inviolate right"