196 Cited authorities

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 159,597 times 179 Legal Analyses
Holding that to establish ineffective assistance prejudice a petitioner "must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different," and " reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome"
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (2000) Cited 26,704 times 101 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (2004) Cited 16,642 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
Estelle v. McGuire
502 U.S. 62 (1991) Cited 20,092 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966) Cited 60,532 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation
Tennard v. Dretke
542 U.S. 274 (2004) Cited 5,535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that petitioner was entitled to a COA on his Penry claim where his evidence of low IQ and impaired intellectual functioning had "mitigating dimension beyond the impact it has on the individual's ability to act deliberately"
Cunningham v. California
549 U.S. 270 (2007) Cited 4,299 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "jury-trial guarantee proscribes a sentencing scheme that allows a judge to impose a sentence above the statutory maximum based on a fact, other than a prior conviction, not found by the jury or admitted by the defendant"
Ring v. Arizona
536 U.S. 584 (2002) Cited 5,011 times 50 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[i]f a State makes an increase in a defendant's authorized punishment contingent on the finding of a fact, that fact—no matter how the State labels it—must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”
Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (1967) Cited 23,567 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
Arizona v. Fulminante
499 U.S. 279 (1991) Cited 5,319 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that admission of an involuntary statement is subject to harmless-error review
Section 187 - Murder
Cal. Pen. Code § 187 Cited 20,063 times
Defining murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being . . . with malice aforethought."
Section Amendment VI - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions
U.S. Const. amend. VI Cited 28,428 times 1 Legal Analyses
Granting the accused the right to be tried "by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."
Section Amendment V - Rights of Persons
U.S. Const. amend. V Cited 19,406 times 5 Legal Analyses
Requiring that crimes be prosecuted on a presentment or indictment
Section 12022 - Armed with firearm in commission of felony or attempted felony; use of deadly or dangerous weapon in commission of felony or attempted felony
Cal. Pen. Code § 12022 Cited 8,980 times
Arming of firearm in commission of a felony
Section 12022.5 - Personal use of firearm in commission of felony or attempted felony
Cal. Pen. Code § 12022.5 Cited 8,246 times
Providing for sentence enhancement
Section 190.2 - Penalty for defendant found guilty of first-degree murder with special circumstance
Cal. Pen. Code § 190.2 Cited 6,017 times 4 Legal Analyses
Prescribing penalty of death or LWOP for special circumstance murder
Section Amendment XIV - Rights Guaranteed: Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal Protection
U.S. Const. amend. XIV Cited 11,497 times 3 Legal Analyses
Containing both a Due Process Clause and an Equal Protection Clause
Section Amendment VIII - Further Guarantees in Criminal Cases
U.S. Const. amend. VIII Cited 9,244 times
Prohibiting "cruel and unusual punishments"
Section 15
Cal. Const. art. I § 15 Cited 3,321 times
Affording “the right ... to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant's behalf”
Section 7
Cal. Const. art. I § 7 Cited 2,130 times 5 Legal Analyses
Guaranteeing due process and equal protection

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS (COREY)

196 Cited authorities

Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”

Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”

Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions

Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

Holding that petitioner was entitled to a COA on his Penry claim where his evidence of low IQ and impaired intellectual functioning had "mitigating dimension beyond the impact it has on the individual's ability to act deliberately"

Holding that the "jury-trial guarantee proscribes a sentencing scheme that allows a judge to impose a sentence above the statutory maximum based on a fact, other than a prior conviction, not found by the jury or admitted by the defendant"

Holding that “[i]f a State makes an increase in a defendant's authorized punishment contingent on the finding of a fact, that fact—no matter how the State labels it—must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”

Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

Holding that admission of an involuntary statement is subject to harmless-error review

Defining murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being . . . with malice aforethought."

Granting the accused the right to be tried "by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."

Requiring that crimes be prosecuted on a presentment or indictment

Arming of firearm in commission of a felony

Providing for sentence enhancement

Prescribing penalty of death or LWOP for special circumstance murder

Containing both a Due Process Clause and an Equal Protection Clause

Prohibiting "cruel and unusual punishments"

Affording “the right ... to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant's behalf”

Guaranteeing due process and equal protection