§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. NUNEZ & SATELE

Appellant, William Satele, Focus Issues Letter

3 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Gonzalez

    54 Cal.4th 643 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 448 times
    In People v. Gonzalez (2012) 54 Cal.4th 643, 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 893, 278 P.3d 1242 (Gonzalez), our high court cited Concha for the broader principle that all provocative act murder requires proof that the defendant personally harbored malice: "A murder conviction under the provocative act doctrine... requires proof that the defendant personally harbored the mental state of malice, and either the defendant or an accomplice intentionally committed a provocative act that proximately caused an unlawful killing."

  2. People v. Concha

    47 Cal.4th 653 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 110 times
    In Concha, two codefendants and an accomplice tried to murder a man during an apparent robbery, and the man responded by killing the accomplice.

  3. People v. Concha

    182 Cal.App.4th 1072 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 51 times
    Rejecting assertion that harmless error under Chun, supra, must be demonstrated by other aspects of the verdict