577 U.S. 92 (2016) Cited 960 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding Florida's former death penalty sentencing scheme unconstitutional because "[t]he Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death"
Holding that case-specific out-of-court statements offered by an expert and not otherwise admissible are necessarily offered for their truth, in violation of the Confrontation Clause
Concluding any error in excluding evidence of the victim's prior felony conviction was harmless under Watson "because there is no reasonable probability that a more favorable result would have occurred had the prior conviction evidence been admitted"