126 Cited authorities

  1. Liteky v. United States

    510 U.S. 540 (1994)   Cited 5,709 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that judicial rulings are "[a]lmost invariably . . . proper grounds for appeal, not for recusal"
  2. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 18,605 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
  3. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 4,532 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the doctrine of harmless error applies to the violation of the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination through the admission at trial of an involuntary confession
  4. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 10,216 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth and Fourteenth amendments include the "right to proceed without counsel" when a criminal defendant "voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so"
  5. Bracy v. Gramley

    520 U.S. 899 (1997)   Cited 2,349 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment establishes a constitutional floor, not a uniform standard" and noting the existence of many laws that legislate above that constitutional minimum
  6. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 2,580 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state court's exclusion of evidence probative of the credibility of the defendant's confession because the proffered evidence was relevant to voluntariness, an issue the court had already ruled on, violated the defendant's right to a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
  7. McKaskle v. Wiggins

    465 U.S. 168 (1984)   Cited 2,017 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that standby counsel may be appointed over a pro se defendant's objection
  8. Morris v. Slappy

    461 U.S. 1 (1983)   Cited 1,931 times
    Holding that Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not guarantee "meaningful relationship" with counsel
  9. Montana v. Egelhoff

    518 U.S. 37 (1996)   Cited 1,054 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the exclusion of even relevant evidence does not violate due process unless it implicates a "fundamental principle of justice"
  10. Kentucky v. Stincer

    482 U.S. 730 (1987)   Cited 1,321 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exclusion of a defendant from an ex parte in-chambers hearing at which the competency of two child witnesses was determined did not violate due process