§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. CAPISTRANO

Appellant’s Supplemental Response Letter Brief

5 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,417 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"

  2. Bruton v. United States

    391 U.S. 123 (1968)   Cited 8,927 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause is violated when the court admits an incriminating out-of-court statement by a nontestifying codefendant

  3. Jackson v. Denno

    378 U.S. 368 (1964)   Cited 5,139 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial judge must determine, at a separate hearing, that a confession is voluntary before it may be heard by a jury

  4. People v. Lucas

    12 Cal.4th 415 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,601 times
    Concluding defendant failed to show counsel were incompetent for omitting to move to suppress evidence on the chain of custody grounds

  5. People v. Duarte

    24 Cal.4th 603 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 418 times
    Finding error in the trial court's decision to admit, as a statement against interest, a statement containing portions that were not “specifically disserving”