§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. ABEL (JOHN C.)

Appellant's Opposition

33 Cited authorities

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,799 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  2. Simmons v. United States

    390 U.S. 377 (1968)   Cited 6,456 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's testimony to establish standing for purposes of claiming a Fourth Amendment violation "should not be admissible against him at trial on the question of guilt or innocence"

  3. Bearden v. Georgia

    461 U.S. 660 (1983)   Cited 1,395 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the State may enforce judgments against indigents by even such intrusive means as compelled "labor or public service"

  4. Douglas v. California

    372 U.S. 353 (1963)   Cited 2,780 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding States must appoint counsel on a prisoner's first appeal

  5. Griffin v. Illinois

    351 U.S. 12 (1956)   Cited 3,154 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preventing an indigent defendant from appealing his conviction due to his failure to pay for a trial transcript is unconstitutional

  6. Wardius v. Oregon

    412 U.S. 470 (1973)   Cited 838 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Oregon's notice-of-alibi rule violated defendant's due process rights under Fourteenth Amendment where rule did not provide for reciprocal discovery

  7. United States v. Security Industrial Bank

    459 U.S. 70 (1982)   Cited 592 times
    Holding that however “rational the exercise of the bankruptcy power may be, that inquiry is quite separate from the question whether the enactment takes property within the prohibition of the Fifth Amendment”

  8. Williams v. Illinois

    399 U.S. 235 (1970)   Cited 864 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state cannot subject convicted defendants to a period of imprisonment beyond the statutory maximum solely because they are too poor to pay the fine imposed

  9. Bittaker v. Woodford

    331 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 699 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of attorney-client privilege for purposes of raising an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim does not extend to retrial, in part because "[e]xtending the waiver ... would immediately and perversely skew the second trial in the prosecution's favor"

  10. People v. Gonzalez

    51 Cal.3d 1179 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 727 times
    Holding that the “bare filing” of a petition for writ of habeas corpus does not trigger a right to discovery because a habeas corpus petition that fails to state a prima facie case for relief creates no cause or proceeding that would confer discovery jurisdiction

  11. Section 30

    Cal. Const. art. I § 30   Cited 87 times
    Authorizing joinder in criminal cases

  12. Rule 8.328 - Confidential records [Repealed]

    Cal. R. 8.328   Cited 22 times

    Cal. R. Ct. 8.328 Rule 8.328 repealed effective 1/1/2014; adopted as rule 31.2 effective 1/1/2004; previously amended and renumbered effective 1/1/2007; previously amended effective 1/1/2005, and1/1/2011. Advisory Committee Comment Rules 8.45-8.46 address the appropriate handling of sealed and confidential records that must be included in the record on appeal. Examples of confidential records include Penal Code section 1203.03 diagnostic reports, records closed to inspection by court order under