564 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 158,786 times   176 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
  2. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 26,646 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
  3. Blakely v. Washington

    542 U.S. 296 (2004)   Cited 16,615 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
  4. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 77,630 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts conducting review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction should view the "evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution"
  5. Sandin v. Conner

    515 U.S. 472 (1995)   Cited 18,641 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liberty interests requiring procedural due process are limited to freedom from restraints that impose "atypical and significant hardship" as compared to ordinary prison life
  6. Estelle v. McGuire

    502 U.S. 62 (1991)   Cited 19,970 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions
  7. Wiggins v. Smith

    539 U.S. 510 (2003)   Cited 9,480 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that counsel's performance was deficient when they failed to expand their investigation into the defendant's life history "after having acquired only rudimentary knowledge of his history from a narrow set of sources," especially when those sources indicated the existence of helpful mitigation evidence
  8. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 15,239 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
  9. Tennard v. Dretke

    542 U.S. 274 (2004)   Cited 5,504 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner was entitled to a COA on his Penry claim where his evidence of low IQ and impaired intellectual functioning had "mitigating dimension beyond the impact it has on the individual's ability to act deliberately"
  10. Village of Willowbrook v. Olech

    528 U.S. 562 (2000)   Cited 6,362 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a class of one could challenge different treatment under the Equal Protection Clause where treatment was alleged to be "irrational and wholly arbitrary"
  11. Section 848 - Continuing criminal enterprise

    21 U.S.C. § 848   Cited 3,828 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the court's authority in certain situations to "impose a sentence, other than death, authorized by law"
  12. Section 15

    Cal. Const. art. I § 15   Cited 3,313 times
    Affording “the right ... to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant's behalf”
  13. Section 37.07 - Verdict Must Be General; Separate Hearing On Proper Punishment

    Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07   Cited 2,411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that "[r]egardless of the plea and whether the punishment be assessed by the judge or the jury, evidence may be offered by the state and the defendant as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including but not limited to the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation, his character, an opinion regarding his character, the circumstances of the offense for which he is being tried"
  14. Section 2C:11-3 - Murder

    N.J. Stat. § 2C:11-3   Cited 2,368 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring courts to either sentence juvenile homicide offenders to 30 years without parole or to make them eligible for parole after 30 years
  15. Section 7

    Cal. Const. art. I § 7   Cited 2,114 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Guaranteeing due process and equal protection
  16. Section 16

    Cal. Const. art. I § 16   Cited 1,775 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the right to a "trial by jury is an inviolate right"
  17. Section 17

    Cal. Const. art. I § 17   Cited 1,409 times
    Prohibiting cruel or unusual punishment
  18. Section 2929.04 - Death penalty or imprisonment - aggravating and mitigating factors

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.04   Cited 1,157 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the jury is to weigh against the aggravating circumstances, inter alia, "the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history, character, and background of the offender"
  19. Section 37.071 - Procedure In Capital Case

    Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.071   Cited 1,041 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Identifying "special issues" to be considered by the sentencer when determining the appropriate sentence
  20. Section 9711 - Sentencing procedure for murder of the first degree

    42 Pa. C.S. § 9711   Cited 740 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the victim's statements about the defendant that were communicated to the defendant were not hearsay when the statements were offered to prove the defendant's motive for killing the victim
  21. Rule 4.421 - Circumstances in aggravation

    Cal. R. 4.421   Cited 2,337 times

    Circumstances in aggravation include factors relating to the crime and factors relating to the defendant. (a)Facts relating to the crime Facts relating to the crime, whether or not charged or chargeable as enhancements, include the fact that: (1) The crime involved great violence, great bodily harm, threat of great bodily harm, or other acts disclosing a high degree of cruelty, viciousness, or callousness; (2) The defendant was armed with or used a weapon at the time of the commission of the crime;

  22. Rule 4.420 - Selection of term of imprisonment for offense

    Cal. R. 4.420   Cited 877 times

    (a) When a judgment of imprisonment is imposed, or the execution of a judgment of imprisonment is ordered suspended, the sentencing judge must, in their sound discretion, order imposition of a sentence not to exceed the middle term, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b). (b) The court may only choose an upper term when (1) there are circumstances in aggravation of the crime that justify the imposition of an upper term, and (2) the facts underlying those circumstances have been (i) stipulated