§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. CUNNINGHAM (JOHN)

Respondent’s Brief

167 Cited authorities

  1. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 26,627 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”

  2. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,252 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

  3. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 15,234 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes

  4. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 23,463 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

  5. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 5,285 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that involuntary confessions are subject to harmless-error review

  6. Miller-El v. Dretke

    545 U.S. 231 (2005)   Cited 2,698 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prosecutor “would have cleared up any misunderstanding by asking further questions” if he truly considered a race-neutral characteristic grounds for a peremptory strike

  7. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 13,222 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here

  8. Edwards v. Arizona

    451 U.S. 477 (1981)   Cited 6,423 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that continued questioning violates Fifth Amendment if suspect clearly asserts right to counsel

  9. Missouri v. Seibert

    542 U.S. 600 (2004)   Cited 1,990 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"

  10. Davis v. United States

    512 U.S. 452 (1994)   Cited 3,046 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the suspect must unambiguously request counsel."

  11. Rule 8.320 - Normal record; exhibits

    Cal. R. 8.320   Cited 132 times

    (a) Contents If the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, or if the People appeal from an order granting a new trial, the record must contain a clerk's transcript and a reporter's transcript, which together constitute the normal record. (b) Clerk's transcript The clerk's transcript must contain: (1) The accusatory pleading and any amendment; (2) Any demurrer or other plea; (3) All court minutes; (4) All jury instructions that any party submitted in writing and the cover page required by