546 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 158,859 times   176 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
  2. United States v. Booker

    543 U.S. 220 (2005)   Cited 25,386 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory
  3. Apprendi v. New Jersey

    530 U.S. 466 (2000)   Cited 26,650 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt”
  4. Blakely v. Washington

    542 U.S. 296 (2004)   Cited 16,617 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[w]hen a judge inflicts punishment that the jury's verdict alone does not allow, the jury has not found all the facts ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment,’ and the judge exceeds his proper authority”
  5. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 77,647 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts conducting review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction should view the "evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution"
  6. Wiggins v. Smith

    539 U.S. 510 (2003)   Cited 9,483 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that counsel's performance was deficient when they failed to expand their investigation into the defendant's life history "after having acquired only rudimentary knowledge of his history from a narrow set of sources," especially when those sources indicated the existence of helpful mitigation evidence
  7. United States v. Olano

    507 U.S. 725 (1993)   Cited 11,255 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain error review requires a reviewing court to refrain from correcting an error unless it is plain and affects "substantial rights," such that the error "seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings"
  8. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 15,242 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
  9. Tennard v. Dretke

    542 U.S. 274 (2004)   Cited 5,510 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner was entitled to a COA on his Penry claim where his evidence of low IQ and impaired intellectual functioning had "mitigating dimension beyond the impact it has on the individual's ability to act deliberately"
  10. Strickler v. Greene

    527 U.S. 263 (1999)   Cited 6,389 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newspaper article detailing that a witness had been interviewed by the police did not suffice to put a defendant's lawyer on notice that records and evidence concerning the witness existed and had been suppressed
  11. Section 187 - Murder

    Cal. Pen. Code § 187   Cited 19,845 times
    Defining murder as "the unlawful killing of a human being . . . with malice aforethought."
  12. Section 288 - Lewd or lascivious act upon child under age of 14 years

    Cal. Pen. Code § 288   Cited 9,313 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining crime of conviction
  13. Section 12022.5 - Personal use of firearm in commission of felony or attempted felony

    Cal. Pen. Code § 12022.5   Cited 8,180 times
    Providing for sentence enhancement
  14. Section 189 - Murder of the first degree

    Cal. Pen. Code § 189   Cited 6,907 times
    Providing that malice may be express or implied – with implied malice being, e.g. , "when the circumstances attending the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart"
  15. Section 422 - Unlawful threat to commit crime

    Cal. Pen. Code § 422   Cited 6,185 times
    Making a criminal threat
  16. Section 190.2 - Penalty for defendant found guilty of first-degree murder with special circumstance

    Cal. Pen. Code § 190.2   Cited 5,949 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing penalty of death or LWOP for special circumstance murder
  17. Section 288a - [Renumbered]

    Cal. Pen. Code § 288a   Cited 3,507 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining oral copulation as "the act of copulating the mouth of one person with the sexual organ or anus of another person"
  18. Section 15

    Cal. Const. art. I § 15   Cited 3,314 times
    Affording “the right ... to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant's behalf”
  19. Section 236 - False imprisonment

    Cal. Pen. Code § 236   Cited 2,702 times
    Defining false imprisonment as "the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another
  20. Rule 4.420 - Selection of term of imprisonment for offense

    Cal. R. 4.420   Cited 877 times

    (a) When a judgment of imprisonment is imposed, or the execution of a judgment of imprisonment is ordered suspended, the sentencing judge must, in their sound discretion, order imposition of a sentence not to exceed the middle term, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b). (b) The court may only choose an upper term when (1) there are circumstances in aggravation of the crime that justify the imposition of an upper term, and (2) the facts underlying those circumstances have been (i) stipulated

  21. Rule 8.630 - Briefs by parties and amicus curiae

    Cal. R. 8.630   Cited 16 times

    (a)Contents and form Except as provided in this rule, briefs in appeals from judgments of death must comply as nearly as possible with rules 8.200 and 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Length (1) A brief produced on a computer must not exceed the following limits, including footnotes: (A) Appellant's opening brief: 102,000 words. (B) Respondent's brief: 102,000 words. If the Chief Justice permits the appellant to file an opening brief that exceeds the limit set in (1)(A) or