34 Cited authorities

Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.
511 U.S. 244 (1994) Cited 3,798 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"
Ake v. Oklahoma
470 U.S. 68 (1985) Cited 3,051 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that when the State presents aggravating psychiatric evidence during a capital sentencing proceeding, the defendant has a due process right to the assistance of a psychiatrist
Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court
426 U.S. 394 (1976) Cited 2,085 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "as a means of implementing the rule that the writ will issue only in extraordinary circumstances," the party seeking the writ must "have no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires"
United States v. Nobles
422 U.S. 225 (1975) Cited 2,135 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that counsel's attempt to make testimonial use of work product materials at criminal trial waived protection
Bearden v. Georgia
461 U.S. 660 (1983) Cited 1,394 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the State may enforce judgments against indigents by even such intrusive means as compelled "labor or public service"
Kastigar v. United States
406 U.S. 441 (1972) Cited 2,163 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Government may compel grand jury testimony from witnesses over Fifth Amendment objections if the witnesses receive "use and derivative use immunity"
Hickman v. Taylor
329 U.S. 495 (1947) Cited 6,496 times 31 Legal Analyses
Holding in the context of the work product privilege that the adversary system requires a party's attorney be permitted to “assemble information, sift what he considers to be the relevant from the irrelevant facts, prepare his legal theories and plan his strategy without undue and needless interference”
In re Clark
5 Cal.4th 750 (Cal. 1993) Cited 3,145 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "absent justification for the failure to present all known claims in a single, timely petition for writ of habeas corpus, successive and/or untimely petitions will be summarily denied"
People v. Duvall
9 Cal.4th 464 (Cal. 1995) Cited 2,665 times
Holding that a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available evidence
United States v. Security Industrial Bank
459 U.S. 70 (1982) Cited 592 times
Holding that however “rational the exercise of the bankruptcy power may be, that inquiry is quite separate from the question whether the enactment takes property within the prohibition of the Fifth Amendment”

PEOPLE v. WEAVER (LATWON R.)

34 Cited authorities

Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

Holding that when the State presents aggravating psychiatric evidence during a capital sentencing proceeding, the defendant has a due process right to the assistance of a psychiatrist

Holding that "as a means of implementing the rule that the writ will issue only in extraordinary circumstances," the party seeking the writ must "have no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires"

Holding that counsel's attempt to make testimonial use of work product materials at criminal trial waived protection

Holding that the State may enforce judgments against indigents by even such intrusive means as compelled "labor or public service"

Holding that the Government may compel grand jury testimony from witnesses over Fifth Amendment objections if the witnesses receive "use and derivative use immunity"

Holding that "absent justification for the failure to present all known claims in a single, timely petition for writ of habeas corpus, successive and/or untimely petitions will be summarily denied"

Holding that a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available evidence

Holding that however “rational the exercise of the bankruptcy power may be, that inquiry is quite separate from the question whether the enactment takes property within the prohibition of the Fifth Amendment”