§Why CasetextPricing

Ruckh v. Genoa Healthcare Consulting, LLC

MOTION for sanctions and MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to preclude use of documents on 1/28/2016

9 Cited authorities

  1. Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co.

    987 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir. 1993)   Cited 778 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to comply with court orders is an "abuse of the judicial process"

  2. Romero v. Drummond

    552 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 269 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding experts under Rule 37 where each report "provided a single paragraph to explain the expert's anticipated opinion and the basis for it" and neither report "stated the expert's anticipated opinion with sufficient specificity" to allow preparation for rebuttal or cross-examination

  3. Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

    427 F.3d 939 (11th Cir. 2005)   Cited 274 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in diversity cases, the Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admissibility of evidence in federal court

  4. Bearint ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorell Juv. G

    389 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 158 times
    Holding that the importance of the testimony is one factor to consider in finding a failure to disclose justified or harmless

  5. Lips v. City of Hollywood

    350 F. App'x 328 (11th Cir. 2009)   Cited 44 times

    No. 08-15803 Non-Argument Calendar. September 25, 2009. Jeffrey A. Norkin, Jeffrey A. Norkin, P.A., Sunrise, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Tracy Ann Lyons, Office of the City Attorney, Hollywood, FL, for City of Hollywood. Tamatha Suzanne Alvarez, Martin, Lister Alvarez, Weston, FL, for Cherie Stetkar, Cherie Stetkar, Francis Hoeflinger, Robert Gianino, Donald Bairerlein. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 07-60253-CVJ-EM. Before BIRCH

  6. Rabello v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

    200 F.R.D. 484 (S.D. Fla. 2001)   Cited 3 times

    Estates of helicopter crash victims that brought action against helicopter manufacturer moved for sanctions for alleged discovery violations. The District Court, King, J., held that sanctions were warranted on grounds that: (1) manufacturer's failure to timely produce accident report of lead investigator following crash was neither inadvertent nor innocent; (2) manufacturer's late delivery of thousands of pages of non-proprietary documents prejudiced plaintiffs; and (3) manufacturer failed to identify

  7. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 102,163 times   702 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  8. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 48,881 times   338 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  9. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,945 times   159 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."