11 Cited authorities

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
563 U.S. 333 (2011) Cited 3,742 times 601 Legal Analyses
Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
500 U.S. 20 (1991) Cited 3,018 times 59 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd
470 U.S. 213 (1985) Cited 3,310 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that the word "shall" in a separate section of the FAA constituted a mandate to the district court
Atalese v. U.S. Legal Servs. Grp., L.P.
219 N.J. 430 (N.J. 2014) Cited 363 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[a]n agreement to arbitrate, like any other contract, must be the product of mutual assent, ” which requires “that the parties have an understanding of the terms to which they have agreed”
Martindale v. Sandvik
173 N.J. 76 (N.J. 2002) Cited 318 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "having agreed to arbitrate, the parties should be bound to that agreement unless . . . the statutory claim cannot be vindicated in an arbitral forum."
Morgan v. Sanford Brown Inst.
225 N.J. 289 (N.J. 2016) Cited 138 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Morgan, the arbitration clause referenced arbitrability but did not clearly delegate this issue to an arbitrator: "[A]ny objection to arbitrability or the existence, scope, validity, construction, or enforceability of this Arbitration Agreement shall be resolved pursuant to this paragraph (the ‘Arbitration Agreement’)."
Morales v. Sun Constructors
541 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. 2008) Cited 104 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a Spanish-speaking employee was bound by the arbitration agreement that he signed, even though he was unable to read it
Barr v. Bishop Rosen & Co.
442 N.J. Super. 599 (App. Div. 2015) Cited 60 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding unenforceable arbitration clause that did not advise that arbitration was binding or final
Curtis v. Cellco Partnership
413 N.J. Super. 26 (App. Div. 2010) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the "[p]laintiff's acceptance of the[] terms [in the VZW Agreement] was confirmed by his . . . activation and use of the wireless phone service plan"
Griffin v. Burlington Volkswagen
411 N.J. Super. 515 (App. Div. 2010) Cited 46 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding an arbitration clause stating the parties, by agreeing to arbitration, "waiv[ed] their rights to maintain other available resolution processes, such as a court action or administrative proceeding, to settle their disputes"

Roundtree et al v. Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration

Holding that the word "shall" in a separate section of the FAA constituted a mandate to the district court

Holding that “[a]n agreement to arbitrate, like any other contract, must be the product of mutual assent, ” which requires “that the parties have an understanding of the terms to which they have agreed”

Holding that "having agreed to arbitrate, the parties should be bound to that agreement unless . . . the statutory claim cannot be vindicated in an arbitral forum."

Holding a Spanish-speaking employee was bound by the arbitration agreement that he signed, even though he was unable to read it

Finding unenforceable arbitration clause that did not advise that arbitration was binding or final

Finding that the "[p]laintiff's acceptance of the[] terms [in the VZW Agreement] was confirmed by his . . . activation and use of the wireless phone service plan"

Upholding an arbitration clause stating the parties, by agreeing to arbitration, "waiv[ed] their rights to maintain other available resolution processes, such as a court action or administrative proceeding, to settle their disputes"