5 Cited authorities

  1. NaturaLawn of America, Inc. v. West Group, LLC

    484 F. Supp. 2d 392 (D. Md. 2007)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the use of expiration and termination "does not undercut th[e] conclusion" that the terms are analogous
  2. Carvel Corp. v. Rait

    117 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 39 times
    Finding irrelevant the fact that Carvel had the option to license another store one mile from the franchisee, where the non-compete clause covered two miles
  3. Apeldyn Corp. v. Eidos, LLC

    943 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Or. 2013)   Cited 6 times
    Stating that the terms "[c]laims of a patent" and "invalidation" are unique to patent law and inform the court that these terms make the clause operate in an unambiguous manner
  4. General Electric Capital Auto Lease v. Violante

    180 N.J. 24 (N.J. 2004)   Cited 6 times

    A-103 September Term 2002 Argued February 2, 2004 Decided May 25, 2004 On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 358 N.J. Super. 171 (2003). CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN and WALLACE join in JUSTICE ZAZZALI'S opinion. JUSTICE VERNIERO filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. William J. Pollinger argued the cause for appellants. William S. Wolfson argued the cause for respondent (John R. Parker, attorney)

  5. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,668 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit