Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Mathews v. Eldridge

Holding that a procedure based on written submissions was adequate because it included safeguards against mistake including that the agency informed the recipient of its tentative assessment and the evidence supporting it and an opportunity was then afforded the recipient to submit additional evidence "enabling him to challenge directly the accuracy of information in his file as well as the correctness of the agency's tentative conclusions"

Morrissey v. Brewer

Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"

Lassiter v. Department of Social Services

Holding that whether the Due Process Clause requires the appointment of counsel is considered on a case-by-case basis

Gagnon v. Scarpelli

Holding that probation revocation is not a stage of criminal prosecution

Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.

Holding that state-court-appellate judge should have recused himself from appeal as matter of due process

Griffin v. Wisconsin

Holding that supervision is a special need of the state "permitting a degree of impingent upon privacy that would not be constitutional if applied to the public at large."

Withrow v. Larkin

Holding that a claimant "must overcome a presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators . . . ."

Fare v. Michael C.

Holding that officers' remarks to a sixteen-year-old juvenile that a cooperative attitude would be to his benefit were far from threatening or coercive where he was thoroughly informed of his Miranda rights and the officers' questioning was "restrained and free from the abuses that so concerned the Court in Miranda"

Richardson v. McKnight

Holding that prison guards employed by a private prison-management firm are not entitled to assert qualified immunity

Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Section 42-8-34 - Sentencing hearings and determinations; presentence investigations; payment of fees, fines, and costs; post-conviction, presentence bond; continuing jurisdiction; transferal of probation supervision

Providing that a sentencing court retains jurisdiction during any period of probation to modify or correct a probated sentence as necessary

Section 40-28-605 - Parole and probation officers - Powers and duties