§Why CasetextPricing

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al

MEMORANDUM

37 Cited authorities

  1. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,121 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

  2. Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n

    432 U.S. 333 (1977)   Cited 4,436 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading

  3. Brodheim v. Cry

    584 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 2,649 times
    Holding that a "mere threat of harm can be an adverse action" if issued in retaliation for a prisoner's use of grievance procedures

  4. Oregon Waste Sys., Inc. v. Dep. of Envt'l Qual. of Ore

    511 U.S. 93 (1994)   Cited 688 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a greater surcharge on disposal of in-state waste than on disposal of out-of-state waste facially discriminated against interstate commerce

  5. C a Carbone, Inc. v. Clarkstown

    511 U.S. 383 (1994)   Cited 431 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a city ordinance requiring all garbage to be processed at a private waste transfer and treatment plant

  6. Philadelphia v. New Jersey

    437 U.S. 617 (1978)   Cited 697 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "where simple economic protectionism is effected by state legislation, a virtually per se rule of invalidity has been erected"

  7. Healy v. the Beer Institute

    491 U.S. 324 (1989)   Cited 486 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state statute violated the Commerce Clause because it had the practical effect of establishing scale of prices for use in other states

  8. Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. Liquor Auth

    476 U.S. 573 (1986)   Cited 511 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Twenty-first Amendment does not confer upon the states authority to regulate alcohol prices in other states

  9. New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach

    486 U.S. 269 (1988)   Cited 472 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding Ohio's assessment and computation of fuel sales tax was a "primeval governmental activity" that "cannot plausibly be analogized to the activity of a private purchaser," even if it produces a subsidy

  10. Wyoming v. Oklahoma

    502 U.S. 437 (1992)   Cited 348 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the loss of specific tax revenues conferred standing

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,736 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 95480 - Purpose

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 17 § 95480   Cited 12 times

    The purpose of this regulation is to implement a low carbon fuel standard, which will reduce the full fuel-cycle, carbon intensity of the transportation fuel pool used in California, pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Health & Safety Code [H&S], section 38500 et seq.). Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 17, § 95480 1. New subarticle 7 (sections 95480-95490) and section filed 1-12-2010; operative 1-12-2010 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2010, No. 3). 2. Repealer

  13. Section 95486 - Generating and Calculating Credits and Deficits

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 17 § 95486   Cited 9 times
    Generating and calculating credits and deficits