2 Cited authorities

  1. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu

    447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 6,296 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]hose who seek to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to dispositive motions must meet the high threshold of showing that compelling reasons support secrecy"
  2. Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 3,573 times
    Holding that the Phillips exception is "expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion"