550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
Holding that employee handbook containing "'disclaimer' language . . . including [that certain rights in the handbook] are not intended to constitute a contract, . . . cannot be found to create an implied contract of employment"
Finding that a complaint containing unsupported allegations that the defendant was motivated by a discriminatory attitude did not set forth a plausible claim of Title VII discrimination
Holding that the handbook disclaimer stating that the handbook did not effect an employee's at-will status was an "insurmountable burden" to the plaintiff's case