Jackson v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.
173 F.R.D. 524 (D. Nev. 1997) Cited 79 timesFinding discovery request limited to period of employment to be within proper temporal limitations
Belcher v. Bassett Furniture Indus., Inc.
588 F.2d 904 (4th Cir. 1978) Cited 93 timesHolding that interrogations during an inspection are inappropriate because they lack the traditional safeguards of a deposition such as swearing an oath, a written record, and being subject to cross-examination
Martin-Parry Corp. v. the C. A. Bader Co.
16 F.R.D. 465 (D. Conn. 1953) Cited 2 timesMotion by defendant to require plaintiff to produce documents for inspection. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Smith, Chief Judge, held that defendant had failed to show good cause and that with respect to originals of which defendant had copies, request for admission of genuineness would be a sufficient remedy. Motion denied. Robert E. Ewing, Shipman & Goodwin, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff. Gross, Hyde & Williams, Hartford, Conn., for defendant. SMITH, Chief Judge
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,284 times 16 Legal AnalysesAllowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes
Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 Cited 13,252 times 150 Legal AnalysesFinding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."