27 Cited authorities

  1. School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.

    5 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 4,791 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "overwhelming weight of authority is that the failure to file documents in an original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into 'newly discovered evidence'" for a motion for reconsideration
  2. Harvest v. Castro

    531 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,015 times
    Holding that a conditional writ of habeas corpus “quite clearly involves the supervision of changing conduct or conditions”
  3. Carroll v. Nakatani

    342 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,157 times
    Holding that plaintiff failed to show injury in fact where he "failed to formulate even a basic business plan"
  4. Smith v. Marsh

    194 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,102 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived"
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald

    432 U.S. 385 (1977)   Cited 400 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a litigant cannot claim "unfair prejudice" when one person takes over an appeal from another
  6. Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham Co., Inc.

    452 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 514 times
    Holding that a plaintiff who accepted a modest Rule 68 offer of judgment based on her attorney's alleged threat to withdraw and false assertion that if plaintiff rejected the offer she risked "enormous" liability for defendants' costs and legal fees was not entitled to relief under Rules 60b
  7. Southwest Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Berg

    268 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 417 times
    Holding that the court is to take facts alleged in the pleadings, motion, and supporting declarations as true for purposes of the motion to intervene
  8. U.S. v. Alisal Water Corp.

    370 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 376 times
    Holding that "an economic interest [that is] concrete and related to the underlying subject matter of the action" may permit a "creditor of a defendant to intervene in a lawsuit"
  9. Donnelly v. Glickman

    159 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 364 times
    Holding that an applicant may lack an interest in the liability phase of an action, but may still be entitled to intervene in the remedies phase
  10. League of United Latin Am. Cit. v. Wilson

    131 F.3d 1297 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 340 times
    Holding that the denial of a motion for intervention as of right as untimely is "controlling" of a motion for permissive intervention
  11. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 53,769 times   147 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment
  12. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,194 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them
  13. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,486 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party
  14. Section 78p - Directors, officers, and principal stockholders

    15 U.S.C. § 78p   Cited 861 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that information obtained by a director could be used in his capacity as a shareholder
  15. Section 77z-1 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 77z-1   Cited 454 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Discussing "[t]otal attorneys' fees and expenses" that can be awarded by court
  16. Section 25401 - Unlawful acts in connection with offer, sale, or purchase of security

    Cal. Corp. Code § 25401   Cited 435 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting securities sales "by means of any . . . communication that includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements . . . not misleading"
  17. Section 25400 - Unlawful acts

    Cal. Corp. Code § 25400   Cited 132 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Making it unlawful for "a broker-dealer or other person selling or offering for sale" a security "to make . . . any statement which was, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or which omitted to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading"
  18. Section 1633.1 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.1   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1633.1 Added 9/16/1999 (Bill Number: SB 820) (Chapter 428).