56 Cited authorities

  1. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,542 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"
  2. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co.

    473 U.S. 479 (1985)   Cited 4,283 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fact that a statute can be "applied in situations not expressly anticipated by Congress does not demonstrate ambiguity. It demonstrates breadth."
  3. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.

    465 U.S. 770 (1984)   Cited 3,125 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdiction was proper in New Hampshire for publication-based defamation torts, even though the defendant magazine publisher sold most of its magazines elsewhere and that, as a result, "the bulk of the harm done to [the plaintiff] occurred outside New Hampshire"
  4. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.

    407 U.S. 1 (1972)   Cited 4,622 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should enforce a choice-of-law clause when it is part of a "freely negotiated private international agreement"
  5. Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.

    547 U.S. 451 (2006)   Cited 874 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a business could not recover against its competitor for a scheme to defraud the New York State tax authority that allowed the defendant to undercut the plaintiff's prices
  6. D.H. v. Gottdiener

    462 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 2,765 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 55, governing default judgment, "does not operate well in the context of a motion to confirm or vacate an arbitration award" because such motions are "motions in an ongoing proceeding rather than a complaint initiating a plenary action"
  7. Jeffreys v. City of New York

    426 F.3d 549 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 2,365 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the nonmoving party may not rely on “conclusory allegations or unsubstantiated speculation”
  8. Iqbal v. Hasty

    490 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,838 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Twombly's plausibility standard "obliges a pleader to amplify a claim with some factual allegations in those contexts where such amplification is needed to render the claim plausible"
  9. First Capital Asset Mgmt. v. Satinwood, Inc.

    385 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 658 times
    Holding that predicate acts over two-and-a-half years did not constitute closed-ended continuity because the complaint "alleged that [defendant] engaged in a single scheme to defraud two creditors by quickly moving his assets to his relatives and then concealing the existence of those assets during his bankruptcy proceeding"
  10. Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG

    443 F.3d 253 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 623 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding "no class may be certified that contains members lacking Article III standing"
  11. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 16,268 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities
  12. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,783 times   167 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities
  13. Section 1964 - Civil remedies

    18 U.S.C. § 1964   Cited 6,232 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Granting civil remedies for RICO violation
  14. Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 302   Cited 4,362 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"
  15. Section 78c - Definitions and application

    15 U.S.C. § 78c   Cited 1,706 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Exempting certain "note" with maturities of less than nine months from the definition of "security" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  16. Section 240.10b-5 - Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

    17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5   Cited 9,396 times   136 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "make any untrue statement of material fact"