No. 90-1539. Argued December 13, 1991. Decided January 17, 1992. Before TERRY and KING, Associate Judges, and MACK, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM: This matter comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) as a reciprocal discipline case that arose because the Supreme Court of Florida disciplined respondent for charging clearly excessive attorney's fees. The Florida court suspended respondent for ninety-one days, required proof of fitness for reinstatement, imposed a two-year probation