§Why CasetextPricing

Richardson v. District of Columbia et al

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond

11 Cited authorities

  1. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman

    460 U.S. 462 (1983)   Cited 10,527 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs’ claims that the state court acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying plaintiffs’ petitions for waiver were inextricably intertwined with the state-court judgment denying their petitions

  2. Kalina v. Fletcher

    522 U.S. 118 (1997)   Cited 1,861 times
    Holding a prosecutor's "activities in connection with the preparation and filing" of a criminal information and motion for arrest were protected by absolute immunity

  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.

    263 U.S. 413 (1923)   Cited 9,719 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal suit was "merely an attempt to get rid of the judgment for alleged errors of law committed" by the state courts

  4. Richardson v. D.C. Court of Appeals

    83 F.3d 1513 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 102 times
    Holding the district court lacked jurisdiction under Rooker-Feldman to consider a claim attacking the suspension of an attorney's bar license

  5. In re Richardson

    692 A.2d 427 (D.C. 1997)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that respondent waived his right to an evidentiary hearing when he chose to resign instead of continuing with the disciplinary proceedings

  6. In re Richardson

    759 A.2d 649 (D.C. 2000)   Cited 9 times
    Rejecting the argument that "the disclosure of [respondent's] bank records pursuant to a subpoena violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures"

  7. The Florida Bar v. Richardson

    574 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 1991)   Cited 17 times
    Imposing a ninety-one day suspension where the attorney overcharged his clients, encouraged the clients to obtain a home mortgage to pay for his excessive fees, and then charged one of the clients a finder's fee for helping the client in obtaining the loan to pay for his excessive fees

  8. In re Richardson

    602 A.2d 179 (D.C. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    No. 90-1539. Argued December 13, 1991. Decided January 17, 1992. Before TERRY and KING, Associate Judges, and MACK, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM: This matter comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) as a reciprocal discipline case that arose because the Supreme Court of Florida disciplined respondent for charging clearly excessive attorney's fees. The Florida court suspended respondent for ninety-one days, required proof of fitness for reinstatement, imposed a two-year probation

  9. Richardson v. Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals

    962 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1997)   Cited 3 times
    Noting that Richardson, after "having previously been rebuffed by [this Court] and the D.C. Circuit" was "trying to get, at the very least, a second bite at the apple" by bringing the "same action again"

  10. The Florida Bar v. Richardson

    591 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1992)   Cited 7 times
    Granting petition to resign with leave to seek reinstatement after three years in lieu of disciplinary proceedings

  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,151 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."