11 Cited authorities

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp.

    135 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 336 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding "as a matter of substantive patent law, all co-owners must ordinarily consent to join as plaintiffs in an infringement suit"
  2. Pit River Home & Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. United States

    30 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that a tribal council was a necessary party in a suit challenging the council's designation by the Secretary of Interior as the beneficiary of reservation property
  3. Rosenzweig v. Brunswick Corporation

    Civil Action No. 08-807 (SDW) (D.N.J. Aug. 19, 2008)   Cited 7 times

    Civil Action No. 08-807 (SDW). August 19, 2008 OPINION SUSAN WIGENTON, District Judge Before this Court are Defendants Brunswick Corporation ("Brunswick") and Brunswick Acceptance Company's ("BAC") (collectively "Defendants") Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff Joel Rosenzweig's ("Rosenzweig" or "Plaintiff") Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c), respectively, and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2). The Court, having considered the

  4. Willingham v. Star Cutter Co.

    555 F.2d 1340 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the continued joinder of the patent owner as an involuntary plaintiff
  5. Shields et al. v. Barrow

    58 U.S. 130 (1854)   Cited 279 times
    In Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, 140, 15 L.Ed. 158, the court said that, if only a part of those interested in the contract are before the court, a decree of rescission must either destroy the rights of those who are absent, or leave the contract in full force as respects them, while setting it aside and restoring the contracting parties to their former condition as to those before the court.
  6. Holder v. Home Sav. Loan Assn

    267 Cal.App.2d 91 (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)   Cited 19 times
    In Holder, the defendant bank did not conspire with the realtors, because the bank officers merely passed on information provided by the realtors without the intent to misrepresent the information the officers communicated to the plaintiffs.
  7. Miracle Adhesives v. Peninsula Tile Assn.

    157 Cal.App.2d 591 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)   Cited 18 times

    Docket No. 17584. February 17, 1958. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Byrl R. Salsman, Judge. Reversed with directions. Action for injunctive relief. Judgment for plaintiffs reversed with directions. Morgan Beauzay for Appellant. Campbell, Custer, Warburton Britton, Burnett, Burnett Somers and John M. Burnett for Respondents. DRAPER, J. Defendant is an association of tile contractors. On behalf of its member contractors, it entered into a collective bargaining agreement

  8. Weissbard v. Potter Drug Chemical Corp.

    6 N.J. Super. 451 (Ch. Div. 1949)   Cited 17 times
    In Weissbard v. Potter Drug Chemical Corp., 6 N.J. Super. 451, 69 A.2d 559, aff'd 4 N.J. 115, 71 A.2d 629, the court refused to declare a "fair trade" contract abandoned and so void in a proceeding to which the retailer with whom the defendant had made the contract was not a party.
  9. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,805 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  10. Rule 19 - Required Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 19   Cited 9,524 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding a person must be joined if disposing the action in the person's absence may leave an existing party subject to a "substantial" risk of incurring inconsistent obligations
  11. Section 3.71 - Prosecution by assignee

    37 C.F.R. § 3.71   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting all partial assignees of patent must participate in reexamination