§Why CasetextPricing

Reveles v. Catholic Health Initiatives

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

31 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 264,376 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 277,581 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Jones v. Bock

    549 U.S. 199 (2007)   Cited 13,745 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that PLRA exhaustion is mandatory, and prisoners cannot bring unexhausted claims into federal court

  4. GFF Corp. v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.

    130 F.3d 1381 (10th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,585 times
    Holding failure to address district court's alternative ground for granting summary judgment compelled affirmance

  5. Martinez v. Potter

    347 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2003)   Cited 583 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that after Morgan claims of discrete employment actions are not exhausted by virtue of earlier EEOC charge even when the claim is reasonably related to the EEOC charge

  6. Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.

    426 F.3d 1304 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 405 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that administrative exhaustion is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an ADEA suit

  7. Jones v. Runyon

    91 F.3d 1398 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 339 times
    Holding that court should examine both plaintiff's administrative charge and district court complaint in assessing subject matter jurisdiction

  8. U.S. v. Salina Regional Health Center, Inc.

    543 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 237 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding a hospital’s failure to comply perfectly with Medicare regulations does not automatically generate FCA liability

  9. Brown v. Unified Sch. Dist. 501, Topeka

    465 F.3d 1184 (10th Cir. 2006)   Cited 194 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "employer's mere reiteration of a broad decision not to consider an applicant for any employment does not revive expired objections regarding its initial statement of that decision," and thus, dismissing plaintiff's § 1981 claims as time-barred

  10. In re Franklin Savings Corp.

    385 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 173 times
    Holding that § 106 does not operate to waive the procedural requirements of the FTCA

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 358,800 times   954 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,396 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  13. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 27,368 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires

  14. Section 13-80-102 - General limitation of actions - two years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-102   Cited 421 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the general limitation for personal injury claims in Colorado is two years from when the action accrues

  15. Section 13-80-108 - When a cause of action accrues

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-108   Cited 216 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Explaining when a cause of action accrues for bodily injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle

  16. Section 24-34-401 - Definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-401   Cited 94 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining "employer" to mean "every . . . person employing persons within the state"

  17. Section 24-34-306 - Charge - complaint - hearing - procedure - exhaustion of administrative remedies

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-306   Cited 61 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing how the hearing is to be conducted

  18. Section 24-34-403 - Time limits on filing of charges

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-403   Cited 13 times

    Any charge alleging a violation of this part 4 must be filed with the commission pursuant to section 24-34-306 within three hundred days after the alleged discriminatory or unfair employment practice occurred, and if a charge is not timely filed, it is barred. C.R.S. § 24-34-403 Amended by 2022 Ch. 473,§5, eff. 8/10/2022. L. 79: Entire part R&RE, p. 931, § 3, effective July 1. L. 89: Entire section amended, p. 1041, § 7, effective July 1. 2022 Ch. 473, was passed without a safety clause. See Colo