550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that the RICO bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to sue under securities laws because the plaintiff did not buy or sell securities
Holding “error to equate” a situation where “the injury is speculative because it is not known whether it will occur at all” to a situation where “the injury has occurred and is known, but it is speculative whether the damages might be reduced or even eliminated by alternative recovery efforts”
Holding that attorney who simply provided legal services to corporation did not participate in operation or management of enterprise regardless of whether he performed those services "well or poorly, properly or improperly"
197 Ariz. 535 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 88 times
Holding that wrongful activity benefitted an employer for the purposes of respondeat superior where the activity generated additional fees for the employer
869 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (D. Ariz. 2012) Cited 44 times
Finding that plaintiff, a superior court judge, stated a valid claim for abuse of process based on defendants having served plaintiff with a federal RICO suit by hiring a process server "whom they knew or should have known had been previously prosecuted for threatening to kill" the plaintiff, and noting that "this is quintessentially the type of allegation that supports a claim for abuse of process"
226 Ariz. 424 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 20 times
Recognizing that, although the family court may consider whether a party has adopted unreasonable positions, "the intent of A.R.S. § 25-324 is to assure a remedy for the party least able to pay"