115 Cited authorities

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A.

    534 U.S. 506 (2002)   Cited 16,758 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding with regard to a 67-year-old plaintiff and a 59-year-old comparator that " difference of eight years between the age of the person discharged and his replacement . . . is not insignificant"
  2. Varity Corp. v. Howe

    516 U.S. 489 (1996)   Cited 2,382 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ERISA fiduciaries may have duties to disclose information about plan prospects that they have no duty, or even power, to change
  3. Great-West Life Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson

    534 U.S. 204 (2002)   Cited 1,689 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding an injunction ordering money funds to be legal relief because it sought to "impo[se] personal liability for the benefits that they conferred upon respondents"
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs

    508 U.S. 248 (1993)   Cited 1,839 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relief under section 502 is limited to remedies traditionally available in equity, such as injunctions, mandamus, and restitution
  5. Pegram v. Herdrich

    530 U.S. 211 (2000)   Cited 1,348 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was "jurisdiction regardless of the correctness of the removal" because the "amended complaint alleged ERISA violations, over which the federal courts have jurisdiction"
  6. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Russell

    473 U.S. 134 (1985)   Cited 2,111 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a participant's action filed pursuant to ERISA § 502 must seek remedies that provide a "benefit [to] the plan as a whole"
  7. American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah

    414 U.S. 538 (1974)   Cited 2,115 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"
  8. Harris Tr. & Sav. Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.

    530 U.S. 238 (2000)   Cited 541 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the authorization under 29 U.S.C. § 1132 "extends to a suit against a nonfiduciary 'party in interest' to a transaction barred by [29 U.S.C. § 1106]"
  9. Central States Pension Fund v. Central Transp

    472 U.S. 559 (1985)   Cited 605 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding ERISA fiduciaries to the "more specific trustee duties itemized in the Act"
  10. Wynder v. McMahon

    360 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 717 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court erred in dismissing on Rule 8 grounds when the complaint, though long, was not "so confused, ambiguous, vague or otherwise unintelligible that its true substance, if any, is well disguised"
  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,478 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  12. Section 1132 - Civil enforcement

    29 U.S.C. § 1132   Cited 26,272 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "[a]ny administrator" who fails to provide documents in a timely manner
  13. Section 1002 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 1002   Cited 11,037 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ERISA is a federal law that sets standards of protection for individuals in most voluntarily established, private-sector retirement plans
  14. Section 1104 - Fiduciary duties

    29 U.S.C. § 1104   Cited 4,825 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Specifying duties of a "fiduciary . . . with respect to a plan"
  15. Section 1109 - Liability for breach of fiduciary duty

    29 U.S.C. § 1109   Cited 2,489 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Breaching fiduciary "shall be subject to such other equitable or remedial relief as the court may deem appropriate"
  16. Section 1024 - Filing with Secretary and furnishing information to participants and certain employers

    29 U.S.C. § 1024   Cited 1,315 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Striking "plan description"
  17. Section 1113 - Limitation of actions

    29 U.S.C. § 1113   Cited 1,042 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing a six year limitations period in instances of fraud or concealment
  18. Section 1105 - Liability for breach of co-fiduciary

    29 U.S.C. § 1105   Cited 929 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a plan administrator may delegate fiduciary responsibilities if permitted by the ERISA plan
  19. Section 1103 - Establishment of trust

    29 U.S.C. § 1103   Cited 880 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Providing that “all assets of an employee benefit plan shall be held in trust by one or more trustees”
  20. Section 1107 - Limitation with respect to acquisition and holding of employer securities and employer real property by certain plans

    29 U.S.C. § 1107   Cited 214 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Exempting ESOPs from the generally applicable 10% limit on the portion of plan assets that may be invested in employer stock
  21. Section 2509.75-8 - Questions and answers relating to fiduciary responsibility under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

    29 C.F.R. § 2509.75-8   Cited 513 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing limitations on directors' primary fiduciary liability " apart from co-fiduciary liability arising under circumstances described in section 405"
  22. Section 230.144 - Persons deemed not to be engaged in a distribution and therefore not underwriters

    17 C.F.R. § 230.144   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing as exempt certain securities "acquired directly ... from the issuer ... in a transaction or chain of transactions not involving any public offering"
  23. Section 2550.404a-1 - Investment duties

    29 C.F.R. § 2550.404a-1   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that the duty of prudence is satisfied if the fiduciary “[h]as given appropriate consideration to those facts and circumstances that, given the scope of such fiduciary's investment duties, the fiduciary knows or should know are relevant to the particular investment ... and [h]as acted accordingly.”