§Why CasetextPricing

Regions Bank v. Samiian et al

RESPONSE in opposition re MOTION to stay Proceedings

6 Cited authorities

  1. McCartney v. Integra National Bank North

    106 F.3d 506 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 175 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the clear language of section 362 stays actions only against a ‘debtor.’ "

  2. In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation

    261 B.R. 534 (S.D. Fla. 2001)   Cited 20 times
    Finding an absence of unusual circumstances where the debtor "takes no position with respect to [extending the stay], and does not seek a stay for the non-debtor defendants"

  3. Freedom Scientific, Inc. v. GW Micro, Inc.

    Case No. 8:08-cv-1365-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 29, 2009)   Cited 4 times
    Finding that the conclusory argument of being direct competitors in the market was insufficient to establish undue prejudice

  4. Gottschamer v. August, Thompson Sherr

    438 So. 2d 408 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Agreeing that the guarantors of a promissory note were entitled to a set-off against the final summary judgment on the guaranty

  5. Mullins v. Sunshine St. Service Corp.

    540 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 15 times

    No. 87-486. March 23, 1989. Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sumter County, Jerry T. Lockett, J. Richard W. Boylston, P.A., Tavares and Larry E. Parrish of Parrish Mulrooney, P.C., Memphis, for appellant. Marsha G. Rydberg of Taub Williams, P.A., Tampa and L. Joseph Shaheen, Jr., of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye O'Neill, P.A., Tampa, for appellee. ORFINGER, Judge. Appellant Marian Mullins appeals from a summary final judgment entered against her for $6,803,898 plus interest, as guarantor

  6. Section 46.041 - Joinder of certain makers, endorsers, etc., of negotiable instruments

    Fla. Stat. § 46.041   Cited 7 times

    (1) The makers of negotiable instruments and all other persons who, at or before the execution and delivery thereof, endorsed, guaranteed, or became surety for payment thereof, or are otherwise secondarily liable for payment, may be sued in the same action. (2) In such action the final judgment shall specify the defendants who are liable for payment only as endorser, surety, guarantor or otherwise secondarily. (3) When a final judgment authorized by this section is paid by one or more defendants