35 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,007 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. New Hampshire v. Maine

    532 U.S. 742 (2001)   Cited 4,638 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”
  3. U.S. v. Ritchie

    342 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 3,860 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may consider "certain materials—documents attached to the complaint, documents incorporated by reference in the complaint, or matters of judicial notice—without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment"
  4. MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman

    803 F.2d 500 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 1,958 times
    Holding that, on a motion for attorney fees, the requesting party must disclose its time sheets to the other party, redacted as necessary where protected by the attorney-client privilege
  5. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co.

    270 F.3d 778 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 928 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an initial “discharge of debt by a bankruptcy court, under these circumstances, is sufficient acceptance to provide a basis for judicial estoppel, even if the discharge is later vacated”
  6. IN THE MATTER OF COASTAL PLAINS, INC. v. MIMS

    179 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 982 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a debtor has duty to disclose all potential causes of action
  7. Turner v. Cook

    362 F.3d 1219 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court judgments are not transactions under the FDCPA; a transaction under the FDCPA must involve some kind of business dealing or consensual obligation
  8. Burnes v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.

    291 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 573 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "courts must always give due consideration to all of the circumstances of a particular case when considering the applicability of this doctrine"
  9. Oneida Motor Freight v. United Jersey Bank

    848 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 634 times
    Holding that “we cannot overemphasize the debtor's obligation” to provide full disclosure
  10. Cusano v. Klein

    264 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 381 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, while a debtors must “be as particular as is reasonable under the circumstances” there are “no brightline rules for how much itemization and specificity is required,” and where the value of assets are unknown, “a simple statement to that effect will suffice”
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,102 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 541 - Property of the estate

    11 U.S.C. § 541   Cited 14,500 times   76 Legal Analyses
    Defining the bankruptcy estate to include "all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the [bankruptcy] case"
  13. Section 554 - Abandonment of property of the estate

    11 U.S.C. § 554   Cited 2,663 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Providing that property that isn't administered and is not abandoned remains the property of the estate
  14. Section 323 - Role and capacity of trustee

    11 U.S.C. § 323   Cited 1,278 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Stating trustee is representative of estate, with capacity to sue and be sued
  15. Section 760 - Defined

    Cal. Fam. Code § 760   Cited 397 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing community-property presumption