§Why CasetextPricing

REALTIME DATA, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

12 Cited authorities

  1. Johnston v. Multidata

    523 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 610 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant did not "ha[ve] a general business presence in [Texas] based on the residence of two employees . . . [who] work[ed] from home and report[ed] to supervisors located in Toronto, Canada" because "[w]hile their presence [was] certainly a regular contact with Texas, it [was] not substantial enough to create a general business presence in Texas"

  2. Mink v. AAAA Dev. LLC

    190 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 534 times
    Holding that website is passive when it provides the user with printable forms and displays contact information

  3. Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt

    148 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 510 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "patentee [does] not subject itself to personal jurisdiction in a forum solely by informing a party who happens to be located there of suspected infringement," as "[grounding personal jurisdiction on such contacts alone would not comport with principles of fairness."

  4. Akro Corp. v. Luker

    45 F.3d 1541 (Fed. Cir. 1995)   Cited 459 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that notice letters were directed to the allegedly infringing entity in Ohio, not to the entity’s lawyer in North Carolina

  5. Trintec Ind. v. Pedre Promo. Prod

    395 F.3d 1275 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 242 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that tortious injury occurs where the infringing product is sold

  6. Synthes v. G.M. Dos Reis Jr. Ind. Com. De Equip. Medico

    563 F.3d 1285 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 187 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding display of products at a trade show after the patent's issuance and "for the purpose of generating interest in infringing products" was a relevant jurisdictional contact

  7. Wenche Siemer v. Learjet Acquisition Corp.

    966 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Burnham did not authorize tag jurisdiction based on in-state service on a corporation's registered agent

  8. QR Spex, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.

    507 F. Supp. 2d 650 (E.D. Tex. 2007)   Cited 41 times
    Finding that samples sent to "four independent sales representatives" in the forum "were merely for demonstrative purposes and is insufficient to subject Oakley to jurisdiction" because, inter alia, "there was no sale arising" from these samples

  9. Medical Solutions v. C Change

    541 F.3d 1136 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that mere display of infringing product at trade show in forum was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction

  10. In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria

    343 F. Supp. 2d 208 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that the act of providing funding to a United States University without more cannot support a finding of general jurisdiction