35 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,174 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,278 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    497 U.S. 871 (1990)   Cited 9,537 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete
  4. IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez

    546 U.S. 21 (2005)   Cited 578 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that time spent walking between the locker room and the production area after donning protective gear is compensable work under the FLSA
  5. Williams v. Borough of West Chester

    891 F.2d 458 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 3,119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that municipalities "cannot be vicariously liable under Monell unless one of [their] employees is primarily liable under 1983 itself"
  6. Skidmore v. Swift Co.

    323 U.S. 134 (1944)   Cited 3,743 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the rulings, interpretations and opinions of the Administrator" of the statute in question, "while not controlling upon the courts by reason of their authority," were nonetheless available for guidance to the extent they had the "power to persuade"
  7. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.

    328 U.S. 680 (1946)   Cited 2,582 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, where employer's records are inadequate, "an employee has carried out his burden if he proves that he has in fact performed work for which he was improperly compensated and if he produces sufficient evidence to show the amount and extent of that work as a matter of just and reasonable inference."
  8. Tennessee Coal Co. v. Muscoda Local

    321 U.S. 590 (1944)   Cited 705 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that underground travel to iron ore mines was compensable work
  9. Armour Co. v. Wantock

    323 U.S. 126 (1944)   Cited 622 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that work is compensable if it is "predominantly for the employer's benefit" and noting that "an employer, if he chooses, may hire a man to do nothing"
  10. Galena v. Leone

    638 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 260 times
    Finding that a County Council meeting is a limited public forum, and “there is a First Amendment violation if the defendant applied restriction [on speech] because of the speaker's viewpoint”
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,681 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,458 times   225 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules
  13. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 8,812 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  14. Section 251 - Congressional findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 251   Cited 717 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the FLSA "has been interpreted judicially in disregard of long-established customs, practices, and contracts between employers and employees"
  15. Section 333.104 - Minimum Wages

    43 Pa. Stat. § 333.104   Cited 90 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Except as may otherwise be provided under this act: (a) Every employer shall pay to each of his or her employes wages for all hours worked at a rate of not less than: (1) Two dollars sixty-five cents ($2.65) an hour upon the effective date of this amendment. (2) Two dollars ninety cents ($2.90) an hour during the year beginning January 1, 1979. (3) Three dollars ten cents ($3.10) an hour during the year beginning January 1, 1980. (4) Three dollars thirty-five cents ($3.35) an hour after December

  16. Section 553.221 - Compensable hours of work

    29 C.F.R. § 553.221   Cited 99 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Stating that time spent on call is compensable if "the conditions placed on the employee's activities are so restrictive that the employee cannot use the time effectively for personal pursuits"