44 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Booker

    543 U.S. 220 (2005)   Cited 25,398 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory
  2. Welch v. United States

    578 U.S. 120 (2016)   Cited 4,884 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Johnson , which invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act's residual clause, announced a new substantive rule
  3. Brecht v. Abrahamson

    507 U.S. 619 (1993)   Cited 11,824 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a court has "never squarely addressed the issue, and ha at most assumed" something in a prior decision, it is "free to address the issue on the merits"
  4. Johnson v. U.S.

    559 U.S. 133 (2010)   Cited 2,749 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) ’s nearly identical "physical force" clause "means violent force—that is, force capable of causing physical pain or injury to another person"
  5. Taylor v. United States

    495 U.S. 575 (1990)   Cited 5,238 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "burglary" as used in the Armed Career Criminal Act was to be given its "generic, contemporary meaning" to avoid a scenario in which "a person ... would, or would not, receive a sentence enhancement based on exactly the same conduct, depending on whether the State of his prior conviction happened to call that conduct ‘burglary’ "
  6. U.S. v. Romero

    491 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2007)   Cited 189 times
    Holding that challenges to the method the district court employed to calculate a sentence implicate procedural reasonableness
  7. U.S. v. Silva

    608 F.3d 663 (10th Cir. 2010)   Cited 152 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding § 30-3-2 is categorically a violent felony under the Elements Clause
  8. United States v. Montes-Flores

    736 F.3d 357 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that ABHAN is categorically not a crime of violence under the guidelines
  9. United States v. Bell

    158 F. Supp. 3d 906 (N.D. Cal. 2016)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that Castleman 's analysis regarding the indirect use of physical force applies equally to the § 924(c) context
  10. United States v. Dominguez-Maroyoqui

    748 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that simple assault under 18 U.S.C. § 111 is not a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines’ enhancement for unlawful entry because it can be committed by "spitting in mail carrier's face"
  11. Section 2255 - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

    28 U.S.C. § 2255   Cited 129,482 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions
  12. Section 924 - Penalties

    18 U.S.C. § 924   Cited 65,709 times   186 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conviction for eluding police, under Maine statute which provides that "[w]hoever, after being requested or signaled to stop, attempts to elude a law enforcement officer by driving a vehicle at a reckless rate of speed which results in a high-speed chase between the operator's vehicle and any law enforcement vehicle using a blue light and siren is guilty" of a felony-level crime, involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)
  13. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 60,453 times   181 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  14. Section 30-16-2 - Robbery

    N.M. Stat. § 30-16-2   Cited 185 times
    Stating that robbery accomplished with the use of a deadly weapon is a first degree felony
  15. Section 30-28-1 - [Effective ninety days after adjournment] Attempt to commit a felony

    N.M. Stat. § 30-28-1   Cited 130 times
    Requiring "an overt act in furtherance of and with intent to commit" the crime
  16. Section 30-6-2 - Abandonment of dependent

    N.M. Stat. § 30-6-2   Cited 2 times
    Providing that abandoning or failing to support a dependent thereby leaving the spouse or minor child dependent upon public support constitutes a fourth degree felony