7 Cited authorities

  1. Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.

    708 F.3d 527 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 238 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rule 12(b) dismissal, concluding that "[b]ecause the well-pleaded facts do not permit [this] [C]ourt to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged — but it has not shown — that the pleader is entitled to relief" (internal quotation marks omitted; final two sets of brackets in original)
  2. Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd.

    460 F.3d 434 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that "Rule B specifies the sum total of what must be shown for a valid maritime attachment"
  3. Admiral Cruise Services, Inc. v. M/V St. Tropez

    524 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (S.D. Fla. 2007)   Cited 3 times

    No. 05-60024-CIV. December 6, 2007 Raul Julio Chacon, Jr., Miami, FL, William Barry Milliken, Hayden Milliken, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge Admiral has filed a motion for summary judgment on the crew members' claims for unpaid tips. For the reasons stated below, Admiral's motion [D.E. 332] is DENIED and summary judgment is entered in favor of the crew members on liability. At the hearing on Admiral's motion for summary

  4. The John G. Stevens

    170 U.S. 113 (1898)   Cited 107 times

    CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued January 27, 1897. Decided April 18, 1898. A collision between two vessels by the fault of one of them creates a maritime lien upon her for the damages to the other, which is to be preferred, in-admiralty, to a lien for previous supplies. A lien upon a tug, for damages to her tow by negligent towage bringing the tow into collision with a third vessel, is to be preferred, in admiralty, to a lien for supplies previously

  5. Bank of New Orleans, Etc. v. Oil Screw Tracy Marie

    455 F. Supp. 78 (W.D. La. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    Civ. A. No. 761021. February 13, 1978. Robert T. Wakefield, Newman Drolla, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs. Francis J. Barry, Jr., Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, Harvey J. Lewis, Lawrence S. Kullman, Kierr, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, Fallon Lewis, New Orleans, La., Daniel L. Morrow Gretna, La., Joseph E. LeBlanc, Jr., Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hillyer Pierson, William L. Von Hoene, New Orleans, La., Evans Sheffler, Gretna, La., for defendants. OPINION VERON, District Judge. The Bank of New Orleans and Trust

  6. Bank of New Orleans v. Oil Screw Tracy Marie

    580 F.2d 808 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 4 times

    No. 78-1624 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. September 21, 1978. Robert T. Wakefield, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant. Kierr, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, Fallon Lewis, Lawrence S. Kullman, New Orleans, La., for intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We

  7. Section 31325 - Preferred mortgage liens and enforcement

    46 U.S.C. § 31325   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing enforcement of mortgage through in rem action against the ship