23 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 29,761 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Resource Bankshares v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.

    407 F.3d 631 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 327 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that property damage was not caused by an accident where the insured "does not deny that it intentionally sent advertisements by fax" and it is "obvious" that the "'natural or probable consequence' of sending a fax" is the "depletion of the recipient's time, toner, and paper, and occupation of the fax machine and phone line"
  3. Angelucci v. Century Supper Club

    41 Cal.4th 160 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 202 times
    Holding that the Unruh Act "must be construed liberally in order to carry out its purpose"
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

    135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015)   Cited 47 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Granting petition for writ of certiorari
  5. Blumhorst v. Jewish Family Services of Los Angeles

    126 Cal.App.4th 993 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 93 times
    Stating that: "the Legislature did create a private cause of action for civil rights discrimination by the amendments to section 11139. . . ."
  6. Gustavson v. Mars, Inc.

    Case No. 13-cv-04537-LHK (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2014)   Cited 55 times
    Finding stay appropriate where decision may change "the applicable law or the landscape of facts that need to be developed" and "the need to re-brief and potentially re-open discovery would involve a significant expenditure of time and resources"
  7. Clifford S. v. Superior Court

    38 Cal.App.4th 747 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 76 times
    Reasoning that a de facto parent, such as a stepparent, is not a parent or guardian and thus does not have a right to reunification services, custody or visitation; accordingly, if such "a person is given services to which he or she is not entitled, there is no right to complain on appeal"
  8. Holmes v. California National Guard

    90 Cal.App.4th 297 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 60 times
    Noting finding in related federal case that the appellant held " ‘an officer position in the state and United States reserve groups that does not require federal recognition and is not subject to being called into federal service’ "
  9. Schmier v. Supreme Court

    78 Cal.App.4th 703 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 36 times
    In Schmier, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of a claim that the predecessor versions of California's publication and citation rules violated constitutional rights to due process and equal protection.
  10. Boise v. Ace United States, Inc.

    Case No. 15-Civ-21264-COOKE/TORRES (S.D. Fla. Jul. 5, 2015)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that determinate duration of stay for the Supreme Court's ruling in Campbell–Ewald weighed in favor of granting motion to stay
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 102,312 times   702 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Section 2510 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2510   Cited 4,351 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[i]nvestigative or law enforcement officer" as an officer "empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make arrests for [certain] offenses . . . and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of such offenses"
  13. Section 637.2 - Action against person who committed violation; injunctive relief

    Cal. Pen. Code § 637.2   Cited 230 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Providing for damages of the greater of $5,000 per violation or three times the plaintiff's actual damages