22 Cited authorities

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,254 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  2. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court

    51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,565 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

    20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 2,427 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"
  4. Jenkins v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    216 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 575 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a loan servicer, as agent for the beneficiary, may record a notice of default and initiate nonjudicial foreclosure
  5. Carma Developers, Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.

    2 Cal.4th 342 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 778 times
    Holding that a clause in a commercial lease allowing the lessor to terminate the lease and recapture the leasehold upon notice by the lessee of intent to sublet or assign had to be exercised in good faith
  6. Chabner v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

    225 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 422 times
    Holding that the Unruh Act prohibits an insurance company from imposing unreasonable pricing differentials based on an applicant's disability
  7. Racine Laramie v. Dept. of P. R

    11 Cal.App.4th 1026 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 315 times
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be extended to create obligations not contemplated in the contract"
  8. Glenn K. Jackson Inc. v. Roe

    273 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 231 times
    Holding that accounting firm hired by client to audit law firm's bills to client owed no duty to the law firm
  9. Mass. Mutual Life Ins. v. Superior Ct.

    97 Cal.App.4th 1282 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 224 times
    Holding that under the CLRA, "if the trial court finds material misrepresentations were made to the class members, at least an inference of reliance would arise as to the entire class."
  10. Agosta v. Astor

    120 Cal.App.4th 596 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 143 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's promise of a compensation package that he never intended to provide plaintiff was an actionable misrepresentation
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 347,250 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 2923.6 - Agreement by mortgage servicer to implement loan modification or workout plan

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2923.6   Cited 875 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing a lender to pursue foreclosure against a defaulted borrower if "[t]he borrower accepts a written first lien loan modification, but defaults on, or otherwise breaches the borrower's obligations under, the first lien loan modification"
  13. Section 2924.12 - Enjoining violations; liability for violations

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2924.12   Cited 409 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that, "[i]f a trustee's deed upon sale has not been recorded, a borrower may bring an action for injunctive relief to enjoin a material violation of [inter alia] Section . . . 2323.6 2923.7"
  14. Section 2923.7 - Establishment of single point of contact upon borrower requesting foreclosure prevention alternative

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2923.7   Cited 404 times
    Discussing the nature of "single point of contact"
  15. Section 1024.41 - Loss mitigation procedures

    12 C.F.R. § 1024.41   Cited 774 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing borrowers to seek damages for servicer misconduct in connection with borrowers' review for loss mitigation options under § 2605(f)