14 Cited authorities

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper

    447 U.S. 752 (1980)   Cited 2,846 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may impose attorney's fee sanction against opposing counsel for “abusive litigation practices” only in “narrowly defined circumstances,” including where the court makes a finding that “counsel's conduct ... constituted or was tantamount to bad faith”
  2. B.K.B. v. Maui Police Dept

    276 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 962 times
    Holding that misconduct committed "in an unreasonable and vexatious manner" that "multiplies the proceedings" violates § 1927
  3. Fjelstad v. American Honda Motor Co.

    762 F.2d 1334 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 318 times
    Holding that the district court exceeded its authority in imposing sanction of default for "negligent failures to provide discovery"
  4. New Alaska Development Corp. v. Guetschow

    869 F.2d 1298 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 254 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while a receiver appointed by the court to manage an estate was entitled to judicial immunity from suit claiming mismanagement, receiver was not absolutely immune from allegations that he stole assets or slandered the plaintiff
  5. Intern. Ass'n of Machinists v. Werner-Matsuda

    390 F. Supp. 2d 479 (D. Md. 2005)   Cited 144 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the CFAA does not proscribe "authorized access for unauthorized or illegitimate purposes"
  6. Zambrano v. City of Tustin

    885 F.2d 1473 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 220 times
    Holding that "[a]dmission to the state bar is the essential determinant of professional ethics and legal competence"
  7. Resolution Tr. Corp. v. S. Union Co.

    985 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 158 times
    Holding that the presence of an unprepared 30(b) designee constitutes "no appearance at all"
  8. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

    208 F.R.D. 606 (D. Neb. 2001)   Cited 120 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an objection that discovery is overly broad and unduly burdensome must be supported by affidavits or offering evidence revealing the nature of the burden and why the discovery is objectionable. It is not sufficient to simply state that the discovery is overly broad and burdensome..."
  9. Naegele v. Albers

    355 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 58 times
    Granting a stay pending arbitration proceedings after finding that claims were “dependent on the outcome of the” dispute being arbitrated, and that “sever[ing] them into separate proceedings” would “frustrate” the “policy reasons for [statutory] mandatory arbitration of fee disputes”
  10. In re Adelphia Communications Corp.

    338 B.R. 546 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that defendant's stored documents were held in the usual course of business for purposes of Rule 34(b) where the records were kept "pursuant to official directives"
  11. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,925 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
  12. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,085 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
  13. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,130 times   147 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."
  14. Section 1927 - Counsel's liability for excessive costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1927   Cited 8,833 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts the power to charge "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred" due to "unreasonabl[e] and vexatious" conduct