17 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. U.S. ex Rel. Joshi v. St. Luke's Hosp., Inc.

    441 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 499 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that pleading standards are not relaxed when the fraudulent scheme is complex, the scheme took place over a long period of time, or information concerning the fraud is in the defendant's control
  4. Drobnak v. Andersen Corpo

    561 F.3d 778 (8th Cir. 2009)   Cited 342 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations pleaded on information and belief meet Rule 9(b)'s particularity requirement when the facts constituting the fraud are peculiarly within the opposing party's knowledge and if accompanied by a statement of facts on which the belief is founded
  5. Renaissance Leasing v. Vermeer Mfg. Co.

    322 S.W.3d 112 (Mo. 2010)   Cited 242 times
    Granting summary judgment where plaintiffs made an independent investigation
  6. Carton v. Gen. Mot. Accep

    611 F.3d 451 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 137 times
    Holding that the factual allegations in a complaint must state a claim to relief
  7. Regions Bank v. J.R. Oil Co.

    387 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2004)   Cited 99 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding injury to junior security interests and rights to repayment "is not injury that may support standing" where senior security interest "completely encumbered the collateral" rendering the junior interest "of no value from its inception"
  8. Steele v. Hospital Corp. of America

    36 F.3d 69 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that patients lacked standing to bring RICO claims for allegedly fraudulent health care billings where insurance companies rather than patients suffered the actual financial harm from the alleged RICO violations
  9. Asa-Brandt, Inc. v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.

    344 F.3d 738 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 58 times
    Finding that "[d]etermining whether an agency relationship exists hinges on the principal's right to exercise control over the activities of the agent" without discussing section 2
  10. Arthur v. Medtronic, Inc.

    123 F. Supp. 3d 1145 (E.D. Mo. 2015)   Cited 12 times
    Finding allegations did not satisfy Rule 9(b)'s particularity requirement where plaintiff alleged fraudulent misrepresentation happened "in November 2008"
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,084 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 39,880 times   331 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  13. Section 1640 - Civil liability

    15 U.S.C. § 1640   Cited 4,967 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "any creditor who fails to comply" liable, with creditors defined within § 1602(g) as persons
  14. Section 1635 - Right of rescission as to certain transactions

    15 U.S.C. § 1635   Cited 3,336 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Granting consumers the right to rescind
  15. Section 516.120 - What actions within five years

    Mo. Rev. Stat. § 516.120   Cited 701 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[a]ll actions upon contracts" shall be brought within five years