§Why CasetextPricing

Public Citizen v. Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Columbia

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Summary Judgment

27 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Booker

    543 U.S. 220 (2005)   Cited 25,429 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory

  2. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.

    508 U.S. 439 (1993)   Cited 920 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Court of Appeals acted without any impropriety in refusing to accept what in effect was a stipulation on a question of law"

  3. INS v. Chadha

    462 U.S. 919 (1983)   Cited 1,250 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was "adequate Art. III adverseness" because the executive branch determined that a federal statute was unconstitutional and refused to defend it but simultaneously continued to abide by it

  4. Clinton v. City of New York

    524 U.S. 417 (1998)   Cited 507 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the power to enact statutes may only be exercised in accord with a single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered, procedure" outlined in Article I

  5. Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. Hood

    541 U.S. 440 (2004)   Cited 391 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states and their agencies are not subject to suit under the Eleventh Amendment

  6. United States v. Jackson

    390 U.S. 570 (1968)   Cited 1,109 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant could still be prosecuted under 1932 Kidnapping Act, despite the fact that a 1934 amendment adding the death penalty as an available punishment in certain instances rendered the Act unconstitutional for a period of time in which the defendant's violations occurred

  7. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock

    480 U.S. 678 (1987)   Cited 348 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding legislative veto provision severable from Airline Deregulation Act of 1978

  8. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    518 U.S. 727 (1996)   Cited 209 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a federal law requiring cable operators to allow access to sexually explicit programming only to those subscribers who request access to the programming in advance and in writing

  9. United States v. Munoz-Flores

    495 U.S. 385 (1990)   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding adjudication of Origination Clause challenges by the federal courts do not evince lack of respect due political branches of government or lack any judicially manageable standards

  10. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Commission

    286 U.S. 210 (1932)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that unless it is evident that the legislature would not have enacted the valid provision without the invalid provision, "the invalid part may be dropped if what is left is fully operative as a law"

  11. Section 1914 - District court; filing and miscellaneous fees; rules of court

    28 U.S.C. § 1914   Cited 24,278 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the clerk of each district court to "require the parties instituting any civil action . . . to pay a filing fee"

  12. Section 1395m - Special payment rules for particular items and services

    42 U.S.C. § 1395m   Cited 71 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating 42 U.S.C. § 1395m

  13. Section 106 - Printing bills and joint resolutions

    1 U.S.C. § 106   Cited 12 times

    Every bill or joint resolution in each House of Congress shall, when such bill or resolution passes either House, be printed, and such printed copy shall be called the engrossed bill or resolution as the case may be. Said engrossed bill or resolution shall be signed by the Clerk of the House or the Secretary of the Senate, and shall be sent to the other House, and in that form shall be dealt with by that House and its officers, and, if passed, returned signed by said Clerk or Secretary. When such