§Why CasetextPricing

Polito v. Tri-Wire Engineering Solutions, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for Summary Judgment

9 Cited authorities

  1. D'Amico v. Christie

    71 N.Y.2d 76 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 467 times
    Holding that application of dram shop law "requires a commercial sale of alcohol"

  2. Ehrens v. Lutheran Church

    385 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 231 times
    Finding that lower court appropriately dismissed negligent supervision claims where plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to show that defendants were aware of their employee's propensity to assault minors or otherwise to engage in sexual misconduct

  3. Sogg v. American Airlines Inc.

    193 A.D.2d 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 105 times
    Finding an inference of discrimination ascertainable from direct evidence

  4. Pace v. Ogden Services Corporation

    257 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 74 times
    Finding a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for plaintiff's termination where defendant "produced evidence that it outsourced [plaintiff's] laboratory work and saved itself a significant amount of money by doing so"

  5. San Juan v. Leach

    278 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 43 times
    Finding that plaintiff's immediate supervisor entering her bed and attempting to kiss and touch her, exposing and fondling his genitals in front of her, and occasional inappropriate comments at work poisoned the work relationship and environment so that plaintiff could not properly focus on the job duties

  6. Crotty v. Dakotacare Administrative Serv. Inc.

    455 F.3d 828 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that a party "must provide something that indicates that its mailing system was reliable and that the system was followed in the relevant instance"

  7. Jachim v. KUTV Inc.

    783 F. Supp. 1328 (D. Utah 1992)   Cited 38 times
    Rejecting employee's claim that "reduction in hours" was a "qualifying event," where plan provided no cessation of coverage until employee's actual termination

  8. Truesdale v. Pacific Holding Co.

    778 F. Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1991)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that when COBRA notices are sent via first class mail to the last known location of the employee, employers have been found to be in compliance of section 1166

  9. Gilroy v. Continental Corporation

    237 A.D.2d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 7 times

    March 3, 1997. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to Executive Law § 296 based on gender discrimination, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated June 4, 1996, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Before: Rosenblatt, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Luciano, JJ. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar ELS appealed from, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion is granted, and the complaint