14 Cited authorities

  1. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 2,139 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a regulation that "makes it impossible for citizens to use [their firearms] for the core lawful purpose of self defense" is unconstitutional
  2. Atkinson v. Inter-American Development Bank

    156 F.3d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 57 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in enacting the IOIA, Congress adopted the body of foreign sovereign immunity law “only as it existed in 1945—when immunity of foreign sovereigns was absolute,” subject only to the President's decision to extend such immunity
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    216 F.3d 1180 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 47 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-1383 Argued May 8, 2000 Decided July 14, 2000 On Petition for Review of a Regulation of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. David E. Adelman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Eric R. Glitzenstein and Howard Crystal. Wendy M. Keats, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Leonard Schaitman, Attorney, and John F. Cordes, Solicitor, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  4. Brzak v. United Nations

    551 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that former U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees was immune under IOIA, where “acts alleged occurred in the course of an official's exercise of functions”
  5. Mendaro v. World Bank

    717 F.2d 610 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that the “facially broad waiver of immunity” in the “World Bank's Articles of Agreement” did not “waive the Bank's immunity to employee suits”
  6. Broadbent v. Organization of Am. States

    628 F.2d 27 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an international organization's employment of civil servants, regardless of their nationality, is not a commercial activity
  7. Inversora v. Energoprojekt-Niskogradnja

    264 F. App'x 13 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    No. 07-7049. February 14, 2008. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 03mc00073). Jon Schuyler Brooks, Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim Ballon, New York, NY, for Appellant. William J. Mertens, Law Office of William J. Mertens, Bethesda, MD, for Appellee. Griffith Lowell Green, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees. Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, Circuit Judge; and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered

  8. Pan American v. Montgomery County

    338 Md. 214 (Md. 1995)   Cited 7 times

    Misc. No. 30, September Term, 1994. May 11, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court. John J. Delaney (David L. Cahoon, Elizabeth M. Hosford, Linowes and Blocher, Silver Spring, J. Thomas Lenhart, Deborah B. Baum, Shaw, Pittman, Potts Trowbridge, Washington, DC, on brief), for appellant. A. Katherine Hart, Sr. Asst. County Atty. (Marc P. Hansen, Acting County Atty., Edward B. Lattner, Asst. County Atty., Rockville, all on brief), for appellee. James H. Hulme, Christopher Van Hollen, Jr

  9. United States v. BCCI Holdings

    73 F.3d 403 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 3 times

    No. 94-5411. Argued November 20, 1995. Decided January 19, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (No. 91cv00655-01) Louis G. Ferrand, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant. William M. Berenson was on the brief. Ruth A. Harvey, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellee United States of America. J. Christopher Kohn and Stefan D. Cassella, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, were on the brief. Before: GINSBURG

  10. Rendall-Speranza v. Nassim

    932 F. Supp. 19 (D.D.C. 1996)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 95-01855 (CRR). July 8, 1996. David H. Shapiro of Swick Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Lester Nurick, Thomas P. Olson, Eric J. Mogilnicki, Lawrence A. Kasten and Sara Needleman Kline of Wilmer, Cutler Pickering, Washington, DC, for Defendant International Finance Corporation. MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court in the above-entitled case are the defendant International Finance Corporation's ("IFC's") Motion to Dismiss

  11. Section 288a - Privileges, exemptions, and immunities of international organizations

    22 U.S.C. § 288a   Cited 88 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Making only the "archives of international organizations ... inviolable" and "[p]roperty ... immune from search"
  12. Section 288 - "International organization" defined; authority of President

    22 U.S.C. § 288   Cited 82 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Listing more than 80 entities "designated by executive order as public international organizations"
  13. Section 286h - Status, privileges, and immunities of the United States

    22 U.S.C. § 286h   Cited 11 times
    Incorporating Art. VIII, § 2(b) into U.S. law