489 U.S. 101 (1989) Cited 8,838 times 54 Legal Analyses
Holding that a denial of ERISA benefits "is to be reviewed under a de novo standard unless the benefit plan gives the administrator or fiduciary discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits or to construe the terms of the plan"
530 U.S. 238 (2000) Cited 542 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that the authorization under 29 U.S.C. § 1132 "extends to a suit against a nonfiduciary 'party in interest' to a transaction barred by [29 U.S.C. § 1106]"
573 U.S. 409 (2014) Cited 303 times 61 Legal Analyses
Holding that a motion to dismiss in an ERISA case "requires careful judicial consideration of whether the complaint states a claim that the defendant has acted imprudently" and declining to adopt a defendant-friendly presumption
Holding an allegation insufficient that stated plaintiff's resale price fixing agreements "have unreasonably restrained, do unreasonably restrain, and will continue to unreasonably restrain trade and commerce in the visco-elastic mattress market ... by eliminating price competition" (omission in original)
29 C.F.R. § 2550.404c-1 Cited 86 times 6 Legal Analyses
Specifying that "The standards set forth in this section are applicable solely for the purpose of determining whether a plan is an ERISA section 404(c) plan" and "are not intended" to determine other responsibilities under ERISA