§Why CasetextPricing

Pinson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al

MOTION to Strike 107 Response in Opposition to Motion

5 Cited authorities

  1. Hollingsworth v. Perry

    558 U.S. 183 (2010)   Cited 404 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a district court's local rules have "the force of law"

  2. Mann v. Taser Intern

    588 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,302 times
    Holding that plaintiffs' response failed to comply with local rule 56.1 because it was "convoluted, argumentative, and non-responsive"

  3. Castro v. Dir. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

    449 F. App'x 786 (11th Cir. 2011)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that "the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing [the plaintiff's] complaint without prejudice" due to "the failure to pay filing fees or move to proceed IFP"

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  5. Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 7   Cited 7,742 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure