8 Cited authorities

Shelton v. Am. Motors Corp.
805 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1986) Cited 740 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that an attempt to depose an attorney about documents her client possessed was protected by the work product privilege, as this knowledge would reflect her judgment as an attorney in identifying, examining, and selecting from her client's voluminous files those documents on which she relied in preparing her client's defense
Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.
232 F.R.D. 633 (C.D. Cal. 2005) Cited 248 times
Finding subpoena imposed undue burden because discovery sought could be obtained from a party in the case
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.
169 F.R.D. 44 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) Cited 237 times
Holding that subpoena that sought discovery of "virtually every document" relating to the defendant that was generated or maintained by a non-party witness during the past ten years was overbroad and had to be quashed or modified
Boughton v. Cotter Corp.
65 F.3d 823 (10th Cir. 1995) Cited 220 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial court "has the discretion to issue a protective order against the deposition of opposing counsel when any one or more of the three Shelton criteria for deposition . . . are not met"
U.S. ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers
238 F. Supp. 2d 270 (D.D.C. 2002) Cited 93 times
Holding that surreplies are appropriate to “[a]ddress new matters raised in the [party's] Reply to which a party would be otherwise unable to respond”
Nova Biomedical Corp. v. i-STAT Corp.
182 F.R.D. 419 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) Cited 32 times
Denying motion for contempt where magistrate judge did not certify any of alleged contemnor's behavior to the district court for determination of contempt and defendant did not move to reconsider or appeal the magistrate's denial of an order of contempt
Jackson v. Brinker
147 F.R.D. 189 (S.D. Ind. 1993) Cited 30 times
Holding that an attorney-issued subpoena satisfied a state law prohibiting access to state medical records unless the access is "ordered by a court"
Rule 45 - Subpoena
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 17,624 times 113 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

Pinel v. Aurora Loan Services LLC

8 Cited authorities

Finding subpoena imposed undue burden because discovery sought could be obtained from a party in the case

Holding that subpoena that sought discovery of "virtually every document" relating to the defendant that was generated or maintained by a non-party witness during the past ten years was overbroad and had to be quashed or modified

Holding that a trial court "has the discretion to issue a protective order against the deposition of opposing counsel when any one or more of the three Shelton criteria for deposition . . . are not met"

Holding that surreplies are appropriate to “[a]ddress new matters raised in the [party's] Reply to which a party would be otherwise unable to respond”

Denying motion for contempt where magistrate judge did not certify any of alleged contemnor's behavior to the district court for determination of contempt and defendant did not move to reconsider or appeal the magistrate's denial of an order of contempt

Holding that an attorney-issued subpoena satisfied a state law prohibiting access to state medical records unless the access is "ordered by a court"

Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"