REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss - NOTICE OF MOTION OF UBS DEFENDANTS AND LUXALPHA DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING AND SLUSA PREEMPTION.. Document
503 U.S. 258 (1992) Cited 1,665 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) could not recover under RICO for stock-manipulation scheme that bankrupted broker-dealers, triggering a statutory requirement that SIPC meet the broker-dealers' obligations to their customers
Noting the "fundamental principle that ... the acts of agents, ... while acting within the scope of their authority are presumptively imputed to their principals"
Holding that district court erred in failing to resolve dispute concerning the plaintiffs' Article III standing before ruling that salt was not a pollutant within the meaning of the Clean Water Act
Noting that the tortfeasor against whom contribution is sought must typically be "subject to liability" to the plaintiff, unless the absence of direct liability is merely the result of a special defense