MOTION for Protective Order FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY, MOTION to Quash SUBPOENA FOR SEEKING IRRELEVANT INFORMATION, MOTION to Sever FOR MISJOINDER
Holding that the district court judge "had the power, but not the duty" to an enter indemnity judgment under Rule 54(b) because there was "just reason for delay," specifically "the need to develop a factual basis for determining how broad the City's . . . liability . . . should be"
Holding that, where evidence of relationship between judgment debtor and its nonparty sole officer, director, and shareholder were sufficient to raise a doubt as to the legitimacy of the transfer of assets between them, "the presumption should be in favor of full discovery of any matters arguably related to Credit Lyonnais's efforts to trace SGC assets and otherwise to enforce its judgment"
Stating authoritatively that "the swarm joinder theory [associated with the BitTorrent protocol] has been considered by various district courts, the majority of which have rejected it"
Holding that "[i]t is well settled that the cessation of activities, either before or after suit is begun, does not in itself bar issuance of the injunction. The matter is in the broadest sense for the discretion of the trial court which is best qualified to form a judgment as to the likelihood of a repetition of the offense."
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 17,614 times 113 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"